Pointless Quote: Gamers are Losers

48 second read
16

Child psychologist Tanya Byron might have surprised everyone by taking a very sober view towards gaming and giving the UK Government what many consider a fair and smart review of the gaming industry. But now she made headlines by hosting a show on BBC 2 called Am I Normal?, an investigation into game addiction. That’s fine – television needs material to sell. It’s just this little quote that caught my attention:

“Michelle Hart is not what you would imagine as a dedicated gamer. She’s an intelligent, 39-year old woman with a decent job and no history of psychological problems.”

So, what do people imagine a dedicated gamer is? A retarded madman without a job? How would we afford the games?

Last Updated: April 18, 2008

James

A total movie glutton, nothing is too bad or too obscure to watch, unless it’s something like The Human Centipede. If you enjoyed that, there is something wrong with you. But bless you anyway – even video nasties need love…

  • I think you’re taking it a bit hatsh, I think she’s leading in, trying to break down the exact perception you’re bringing up.

    doobiwan’s last blog post..The GTA4 & Rock Band combo:Xbox 360’s European Assault

  • James Francis

    Maybe, but the words were poorly chosen.

  • I agree, that wasn’t thought through from the script writers side.

  • Mr Critic

    You’ve taken a little information and posted it out of context. The program goes on to say that she spends hours and hours in front of her PC screen playing this game. She is addicted to WOW. The psychological problems comment is central to the theme of the program – can games addiction be compared to drug addiction.

    Don’t post stuff out of context – was your post intended to deliberately wind people up?

  • LazySAGamer

    I can’t speak for the Authors original intentions, however I do agree with his statement that the words were poorly chosen.

    Gamers in general have been pigeon holed and while the show was trying to break that stigma they could have started it all off in a better manner

  • James Francis

    I’m a bit at a loss on how what you say changes the context of the above quote. I wasn’t talking about the program. If I was, I could have made noise around what the other gaming sites did – that comparisons between game addiction and hard drugs were made. Instead, I’m simply isolating this specific quote and its general poor choice of words.

  • David

    THAT women is WRONG IF SHE SAID THAT TO MY FACE I WOULD SNAP HER NECK WITHOUT A SECOND THOUGHT.HA ha she’s the loser

  • LazySAGamer

    Way to go in proving that gamers are not psychotic…

    I think she is trying to help and just got it wrong

  • David

    Your DAM RIGHT LAZYSAGAMER. All we need to do is put a next-gen controller in hands and she’ll be hookedand probably change her mind and if she doesn’t we’ll just send some spacial ops recon team to take her out 😉 hahaha

  • bhw

    Here’s hoping David is a master satirist with a penchance for irony

  • The gaming industry has got soem pretty good press recently, between Byron and the researchers that were recently on X-Play.

    What the Games industry needs now is to pull finger and deliver some exceptional developmental games that reinforce the positive message. I reckon something like the Lego MMO has a chance to make a massive impression in that regard.

    doobiwan’s last blog post..The GTA4 & Rock Band combo:Xbox 360’s European Assault

  • Mr Critic

    no no no

    The program begins with examples of classic addiction – Heroin, cocaine etc and discusses how people become addicted. Just before introducing M. Hart, the presenter asks the question ‘what is addiction?’ and then talks about Ms. Hart’s addiction (as it was) to WoW. The program showed how there were basic similarities between her behaviour and that of an addict. That is why Ms. Hart was introduced as a person with a decent job and no history of psychological problems. It was a reference to an ‘addict’, and was designed to b in stark contrast to the drug dependent addicts. Nothing to do with gaming. Dr. Byron is a professional psychologist and knows her stuff – she is not some dumb presenter with a script. She knows what she is talking about.

    Watch the program again, and you’ll see.

    Dr. Byron has done more for the image of gaming recently than any other media presenter. The Byron Review is balanced and mature.

  • LazySAGamer

    Hi Mr Critic,

    Any chance you could organise an electronic version of this show?

    Or point me in the direction to download it?

  • Mr Critic

    I did not see the show when originally broadcast. I downloaded it from the BBC’s site and viewed it via the BBC iPlayer. However, I think it may have expired now. If I see a reference to it, I’ll post it.

  • James Francis

    I was referring to the specific quote and its poor choice of words.

  • Mr Critic

    The program does not seem to be available any more. However, here are some quotes:

    This is from MCV who also seem to have missed the point:
    http://www.mcvuk.com/interviews/233/Tanya-Byrons-TV-show-The-quotes-in-full

    From http://www.guardian.co.uk/tv_and_radio/story/0,,2273475,00.html

    Gordon Brown’s favourite clinical psychologist, Dr Tanya Byron, investigates whether addiction is illness or a choice. While some shouty American author is in no doubt that it’s the latter – and addicts are weak and self-indulgent – others to whom the poised Byron speaks suggest otherwise, – and they have evidence to back it. Or at least lots of brain scans. Here, Byron also questions if behaviours, such as shopping, can become addictive like substances, such as heroin, and examines unorthodox treatments that may rid addicts of their cravings.

Check Also

Ninjas in Pyjamas defend IEM Oakland title

Ninjas in Pyjamas took the IEM Oakland trophy home as underdogs and consecutive title defe…