Home Gaming Watch Dogs 2 seems a lot more stable on PC

Watch Dogs 2 seems a lot more stable on PC

2 min read
19

Watch Dogs 2 on PC is pretty great

The very first Watch Dogs was a bit of a mess, with a weak protagonist, wet towel of a story and some under baked mechanics. It was even worse playing on PC, with the port infamously taking weeks to reach barely stable performance and never quite reaching the standards expected or a high-profile release. Watch Dogs 2 has already addressed the more game centric issues with the franchise, but its PC release yesterday was really about answering one question: does it run well?

According to a few early impressions pieces and technical analysis, it’s not too bad. Firstly Watch Dogs 2 offers up a host of options to tinker with, which thankfully has come more commonplace in PC ports over just a handful or sliders and binary options. The settings menu allows you to tweak nearly every facet of the visuals, with a neat VRAM counting keeping you in check with your hardware. You can see all of the settings below.

Watch Dogs 2 PC Settings 1

Watch Dogs 2 PC Settings 2

Watch Dogs 2 PC Settings 3

Reports indicate that the auto-settings functionality aims to run the game at 1080p and 30FPS, so don’t be too shocked if your system immediately maxes everything out on your first boot up. Getting that frame rate up to a solid 60FPS takes some tinkering on some older hardware (such as the GTX 970). PCInvasion tested the title briefly with their own GTX 970, and found that the game ran admirably with a mix of high to very high settings at around 60FPS at 1080p. A little tweak here and there and that was locked down.

If you’re packing something a little more powerful though, Watch Dogs 2 scales relatively well. The game is still out of reach at 4K with a single card (the GTX 1080 reportedly still doesn’t manage 30FPS), but in the 1440p range the game still runs smoothly. There’s also an additional 6GB texture pack up for download, which replaces some of the default muddy textures with sharper details. There’s still some reports of infrequent frame rate drops across the board (even with new Nvidia and AMD drivers), and those running on red cards are likely to find worse performance than their green counterparts.

But for the most part it seems agreeable that this port is leaps and bounds ahead of the mess that the first one was, and is a very solid foundation for Ubisoft to hopefully improve on in the coming weeks. Get out there and start hacking.

Last Updated: November 30, 2016

19 Comments

  1. Wow, dat XBone shadow effects……….so bad

    Reply

    • Ottokie

      November 30, 2016 at 09:10

      Well it IS being played on a media player.

      Reply

      • Admiral Chief Argonian

        November 30, 2016 at 09:12

        Even the PS shadow effects is quite meager

        Reply

  2. Alien Emperor Trevor

    November 30, 2016 at 09:13

    Always good when devs/pubs take enough pride in their work to make sure it works well on release.

    Reply

    • Admiral Chief Argonian

      November 30, 2016 at 09:15

      Agreed

      Reply

    • Captain JJ

      November 30, 2016 at 09:38

      What is this, praise? For Ubi?
      What’s happening Trevor?
      It’s like I don’t even know you anymore 😛

      Reply

      • Alien Emperor Trevor

        November 30, 2016 at 09:42

        I give credit where credit is due.

        Reply

        • Captain JJ

          November 30, 2016 at 09:46

          Wow. That says a lot about why you never compliment me. XD

          Reply

          • Alien Emperor Trevor

            November 30, 2016 at 09:48

            How rude & totally untrue! I do when I want something.

          • Captain JJ

            November 30, 2016 at 09:50

            Yay!
            Wait, what?

  3. Andre Fourie

    November 30, 2016 at 09:19

    WHERE IS HAMMER????????? He has been AWOL for a while now?

    Reply

    • Admiral Chief Argonian

      November 30, 2016 at 09:37

      …oh crap I forgot to let him out!!!!!!!!

      brb

      Reply

      • Andre Fourie

        November 30, 2016 at 09:39

        Naughty corner? For what???

        Reply

  4. Kromas Ryder

    November 30, 2016 at 09:23

    Wait … someone actually bought the game …. AND on PC???!!!.

    They must not have heard of either Watch_Dogs or Ubisoft before.

    Reply

    • Craig "CrAiGiSh" Dodd

      November 30, 2016 at 15:01

      Guilty 😀

      WITNESS ME !!!

      Reply

      • Kromas Ryder

        November 30, 2016 at 15:50

        May the gaming gods have mercy on your soul. 😛

        Reply

  5. Craig "CrAiGiSh" Dodd

    November 30, 2016 at 15:01

    I have to admit, its running surprisingly okay on my rig and with my current GTX 670.

    I’m still messing around with the setting but so far, I’ve averaged 51 – 60 FPS on 1080p (144hz).
    Obviously a lot of the fancy, shiny setting have been turned off.

    Really want to get my GTX 1060 ASAP now 🙁

    But yeah. I’ve probably out in +-2 hours so far and I have to say its a MASSIVE step up from Watch_Dogs (and YES, I enjoyed Watch_Dogs) – COME AT ME BREH!!!

    Keen to play more and get further into the story line of things.

    Reply

  6. ElimiNathan

    December 1, 2016 at 08:55

    Just had a look at Steam and saw good reviews. Not what I was expecting

    Reply

  7. Waheed

    December 3, 2016 at 04:21

    lol @ gtx 970 “old hardware”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Have a Far Cry 5 Weekend on Ubisoft

I’m baaaaack…. Geez…bugs are sneaky but stupid. I still feel like warmed up Gouda, but any…