I finally watched Tenet on Wednesday. That may be an odd way to open a review for Wonder Woman 1984, but I actually saw Chris Nolan’s twisty sci-fi production at home on VOD just two hours after returning from the cinema where I watched WW84. Of course, Tenet is infamous for Nolan and Warner Bros pushing ahead with releasing it in the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic earlier this year to try and get people back into cinemas, only for that strategy to fail spectacularly. But now having seen WW84, I’m convinced WB entirely backed the wrong horse in this race back to cinematic normality.

Not that I’m saying you should have rushed out to the cinemas for this latest DC Comics superhero blockbuster had it been released in its original August slot. Hell, even now I’m not saying you should rush out for it or any movie really (I was lucky enough to score an early morning screening where there was only one other person in the cinema). But if there had to be a movie in WB’s stable that I would have chosen to be the torchbearer leading us out of the dark, cloying miasma of 2020, instead of the intellectually impressive but sterile sci-fi braininess of Tenet it would have been Wonder Woman 1984, a bold, gushing superhero film that seems to have been custom-engineered to combat the salvos of horror, dread, and lies that got flung at us this year.

In fact, while returning director Patty Jenkins penned the script with co-writers Geoff Johns and David Callaham long before the events of 2020 came to pass, it’s almost shocking how timely it is. This is a movie, from its lapis lazuli opening frames showcasing the achievements of a young Diana (played by a feisty Lilly Aspell once again) on the golden isle of Themiscyra to its emotionally-swelling final moments featuring a golden armour-wearing adult Diana Prince (Gal Gadot), that is all about the power of the truth: Living it, admitting it to ourselves, fighting the denial of it. It’s also about the disenfranchised and societal flotsam who will latch onto the promise of any truth offered to them with fanatical, white-knuckled fervor, no matter it’s flimsy construction. It’s about excess and instant gratification at the cost of others, concepts that shine through so starkly in the era of 1980s America with its junk food gobbling strip malls and TV snake oil salesmen that this film is set in.

And if that sounds like a lot for a brightly coloured comic book movie where a lady lassos bullets from out of the air with a magical rope, then that’s because it is. WW84’s script bounces around quite a bit. We learn that in the years since the events of the World War I-set first film in which Diana lost the love of her life in Chris Pine’s Steve Trevor, she has had few personal attachments. Diana has buried herself in her work as a historian at the Smithsonian, and while she tries to keep a very low public profile with her Wonder Woman superhero exploits, she can’t stop herself from helping out where she can (as long as it’s away from cameras).

It’s at one of these interventions, stopping a jewelry store heist in a mall, where a mysterious ancient relic enters her orbit. It shows up again in her other professional life, when the FBI asks the assistance of Diana’s new gemologist-colleague-turned-only-friend, the socially awkward and frumpy Barbara Minerva (Kristen Wiig), to trace its origins. Also seemingly interested in this relic for his own reasons is Maxwell Lord (Pedro Pascal), a TV personality/businessman selling people on a get-rich quick scheme with his toothy grin and soundbite catchphrases. “Welcome to the future! Life is good but it can be better… and all you need is to want it!”, he wolfishly preaches during one of his commercials. And Maxwell Lord definitely wants it.

“It” being some pretty wild dreams of power, although he is not alone in this wish-fullfilment pursuit. Barbara idolizes the perfect life she imagines the beautiful, poised, and accomplished Diana to have and wishes for the same, while Diana – who sees a kindred friendless spirit in Barbara – is still mending a broken heart more than six decades later and wishes for the return of her love. All three of these characters will soon realize the truth: Getting what you want often comes with a terrible price.

Hardcore comic book purists may take issue here with WW84’s script as it’s a wholly original thing that doesn’t draw from any of the source material. Iconic comic book elements from Wonder Woman’s history are introduced, but in some very different ways. And, in one rather significant case involving Diana’s godly gifts, a bit clumsily and rushed.

The script also greatly changes up the established origin stories of Barbara and Maxwell Lord, as the former slowly becomes Wonder Woman arch-rival Cheetah over the course of the film while Lord descends into villainy. Well actually “villainy” is too strong a word here as both Wiig and Pascal get given some great, layered material to work with, with Pascal in particular just reveling in it with a brilliant go-for-broke performance that runs the full gamut of emotions and morality. Gadot has her own dramatic heavy lifting to do, mainly centered around [SPOILER ALERT IF YOU’VE SOMEHOW NOT SEEN ANY TRAILERS OR PROMOS] the impossible return of Diana’s long-deceased beau Steve. How is he back and what does it mean for her going forward?

It’s also through Diana and Steve’s chemistry-packed interactions that Jenkins injects bouts of genuine levity into the affair, reversing the fish-out-of-water roles between the two from the first film. Now, instead of a naive Diana being introduced into Man’s World, it’s a wide-eyed Steve discovering the Modern World of the 1980s with all its gaudy fashion, breakdancing, and technological advancements. Jenkins also gives the star-crossed couple some incredible backdrops to play out their story on thanks to gorgeously framed visuals. It’s a pity that many won’t see this film on IMAX as it would soar there.

Annoyingly though, while Jenkins stages some amazing big and bright action sequences set around the globe – major standouts being the fun and zippy aforementioned mall scene and a multi-vehicle car/foot chase in Egypt – the filmmaker once again Snyder-izes the film’s climactic final battle, just like she did in WW84’s predecessor. Choppy edits and obscuring shadows abound, especially aggravating since it prevents you from getting a proper look at Barbara’s amazing practical effects transformation into Cheetah. This is a movie that leans into some of Wonder Woman’s more hokey aspects and the shoulder-padded, hairspray goofiness of the 1980s without abandon, but feels reluctant to show off its cat-lady baddie in all her comic book glory. 

Luckily, it’s a finale comprised of a lot more than the prerequisite CG explosions and slow-mo fisticuffs as it digs deep into Wonder Woman’s greatest power of all: her heart. Unlike the grim nihilism of some of her DC counterparts, Gadot’s superhero is the very definition of the word, a beacon of inspiration, and Gadot sells it even when the dialogue dials up the sentimentality.

The result is that WW84 is undoubtedly more uneven than its trailblazing predecessor. It’s a bit messy and overstuffed and doesn’t quite stick the superhero-landing on all of its many leaps. However, it executes its uplifting central theme so completely, dovetailing all the myriad elements of its story into that concept of “Truth”, that I didn’t mind one bit. It’s fun and pretty and a little cheesy – but it’s the good cheese that leaves you walking out of the cinema with hope and joy, fully distracted from the numbing rigors of the real world. And isn’t that exactly what pop culture entertainment is supposed to do?

PS: Stay seated for a little mid-credits surprise that should put a smile on the face of any fan.

Last Updated: December 18, 2020

Wonder Woman 1984 boasts great turns from its well-written cast and some fun eye-popping action, but it also takes on a lot in terms of the story and doesn't nail all of it. However, these small stumbles are almost all but forgiven just for how this DC Comics sequel succeeds overwhelmingly in that most superheroic of endeavours: To inspire and bring joy.
8.0
60/ 100

26 Comments

  1. I didn’t consider Tenet to be an “intellectual” movie, tbh.
    Plus, they stole the relationship idea from The Doctor and River Song.

    Reply

    • Kervyn Cloete

      December 18, 2020 at 15:49

      I found it intellectual in that it’s almost all just big ideas with very little in terms of heart or emotion. Hell, even the Protagonist’s response to everything is so lacking in awe and wonder. It’s just clinically… cold.

      The set pieces are fantastic though and the script gymnastics pulled off is superb, and puzzling out just how certain scenes were filmed where different aspects flowed in different directions at the same time will keep me busy for ages. But I only felt the whole thing start to come alive at the halfway point. Before it was like reading a text book about the big bang instead of seeing the big bang.

      Reply

      • Original Heretic

        December 18, 2020 at 15:58

        It’s a good movie, don’t get me wrong. And the fact that Nolan didn’t use CGI is all the more impressive.
        But I found very little to “figure out”, in terms of the plot, I mean.
        I found that I was able to predict most of what was going to happen.
        It’s wasn’t nearly as thought provoking as something like Memento or Inception.
        For me it was purely an action movie with some timey wimey shenanigans.
        And also VERY meta. I mean, the protagonist actually referring to himself as such?

        And his cold clinical reactions were to me on par with his character. This is a spec ops military guy who in the opening scene is willing to, and even fights to, swallow the pill.
        He was pragmatic to a fault.

        Reply

        • Kervyn Cloete

          December 18, 2020 at 18:02

          Yeah I actually didn’t find the plot confusing at all like some people did. Followed it very easily.

          Reply

          • Original Heretic

            December 18, 2020 at 18:04

            Probably because we’re Doctor Who fans.
            All other time things tend to become imitations.
            And if you can wrap your head around THOSE shenanigans, all the rest becomes simple.

    • Jawaka

      December 24, 2020 at 03:35

      The entire movie it sounded like the cast were reading from a script more than having actual conversations. I don’t know if it was poor acting, poor directing or poor everything but it made it hard to watch.

      Reply

    • Jawaka

      December 24, 2020 at 03:35

      The entire movie it sounded like the cast were reading from a script more than having actual conversations. I don’t know if it was poor acting, poor directing or poor everything but it made it hard to watch.

      Reply

    • Mandalorian Jim

      December 30, 2020 at 14:48

      I finally got round to watching Tenet, and you’re right, it’s not an “intellectual” movie. However, it is an interesting film, and it shows that Christopher Nolan is still a master of his craft. But, calling it “intellectual” is like saying the Matrix is some cerebral tour de force.

      But, I also think it was his weakest movie so far. It’s filled with great concepts but the execution just isn’t perfect.

      Reply

  2. RideBoks

    December 19, 2020 at 09:35

    Safe to say if you didn’t like the first one that you wont enjoy this one? I am curious about that mid credit scene….

    Reply

    • Kervyn Cloete

      December 21, 2020 at 07:47

      That’s actually a difficult question as the two play out very differently in certain aspects. But they’re not THAT dramatically different overall for me to say “yes”.

      Reply

    • Mandalorian Jim

      December 29, 2020 at 15:56

      They’re very different, the first one was a competent piece of film-making, the sequel is a mediocre mess, with bad cgi, horrible editing, pointless scenes/sequences, a really dumb story, massive pacing issues and a running time that’s completely unnecessary.

      Reply

  3. Mandalorian Jim

    December 29, 2020 at 15:43

    I think the only word that describes WW84 is “disappointing”. I don’t know what went wrong, but it’s almost like Patty Jenkins forgot the art of directing, screenwriting, pacing and editing.

    Take the first 20 minutes, with a young Diana in Themyscira, what was the point of this opening? And then when you hit the 60 minute mark and you realise nothing of importance has happened and there’s still another hour and a half to go… good grief….

    The first wonder woman movie was such a pleasure to watch. It was funny. It had excellent action sequences, and while the last 20 minutes is definitely a letdown, it’s still a great movie. WW84 is like discussing politics with Gavin; I’ve never been so bored in my life. I felt every single minute of the 2 hours and 30 minutes of this movie…

    Gal gave her best shot and Pedro Pascal made a good Max Lord, but holy crapsticks what a mediocre mess of a movie…

    Patty… what went wrong????? Why didn’t you cut and streamline this movie???

    Reply

    • Mandalorian Jim

      December 29, 2020 at 15:45

      This is a disappointing 5/10 for me. It’s just so painfully meh…

      Reply

      • Grid10ck

        December 30, 2020 at 17:06

        Have to agree with you there, really poor writing, plot holes, people teleporting around the world, the list goes on. Don’t know why they didn’t just stick with the original writers and directors.

        O not to mention the double opening…… cut one of them out and the movie is still 30 minutes too long.

        Reply

      • Grid10ck

        December 30, 2020 at 17:06

        Have to agree with you there, really poor writing, plot holes, people teleporting around the world, the list goes on. Don’t know why they didn’t just stick with the original writers and directors.

        O not to mention the double opening…… cut one of them out and the movie is still 30 minutes too long.

        Reply

        • Mandalorian Jim

          December 31, 2020 at 16:43

          I think the problem was that Patty wasn’t just content with being the director but she also wanted to be a writer. It wouldn’t surprise me if the reshoots came because Geoff Johns had to step in to make some sense of the script, and to steer it into some sort of coherent direction. Obviously, his attempts failed.

          The whole movie went through the ringer, but hopefully this will leave Patty to realise that she’s better as a director – than a screenwriter. I can’t fault her ability as a director, but the writing for this movie was pathetic and cringeworthy.

          It really showed a lack of understanding of Wonder Woman that was absolutely baffling. It almost reminded me of that awful Halle Berry Catwoman movie from 2004, where the writers and producers clearly didn’t know what Catwoman was about in the comics.

          Strangely, Wonder Woman 3 has been greenlit, and I can only hope that Patty is kept away from penning a story, and that they rope in the original gang who were responsible for the phenomenal screenplay from the first movie.

          Let her direct the next one, but please… don’t let her play screen writer again.

          Reply

          • For the Emperor!

            January 4, 2021 at 19:13

            I can find no fault in your comments thus far (for a change haha). Agree strongly, got to 45 minutes and felt “WTF when does the movie start”. And the whole Steve Trevor thing felt so damn forced – we had them in the first movie, having it in here was just “desperate”…

            And the whole “losing my powers” thing but can suddenly make the plane vanish irked me…and how much fuel that darn plane had in it!!

          • HvR

            January 11, 2021 at 01:34

            Think this is where Jim’s criticism comes in, director-writer wanted the good looking fireworks scene and just slapped in the a weird does not make sense cross over into it.

          • Mandalorian Jim

            January 12, 2021 at 01:54

            lol, and remember it was standing at the Smithsonian (A MUSEUM)… And it’s fully fuelled, and in a state to fly…HAHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHAHAH!!!

  4. Kapitan Balalaika

    January 4, 2021 at 18:31

    Dumb movie. Worst DCEU film.

    Reply

  5. HvR

    January 11, 2021 at 01:28

    Finally got around to watching it last night, think Kervyn was so starved for movies in 2020 he had starry no fault filter glasses on.

    It was terrible, if you ignore the B-grade movie CGI sequences and weird plot pacing a 6/10 will still be a generous score.

    Reply

    • Mandalorian Jim

      January 12, 2021 at 01:03

      You know, I was actually thinking it reminded me a lot of the third Spiderman movie, both these films needed streamlining, and one of the villains had to be excluded. In Raimi’s Spiderman III it should have been just Venom or just Sandman. And, with this movie, it should have been either Cheetah or Max Lord.

      I kind of liked the idea of Cheetah having this girl crush on Diana and then as time goes on, and the love becoming unrequited, the adoration turns to loathing and then something happens and she becomes Cheetah.

      But yeah, long story short, WW84 is a shit movie…

      Reply

  6. Gavin Mannion

    January 18, 2021 at 01:19

    Watched this on the weekend and just have to say…. it was awful https://media2.giphy.com/media/3taYXLxSBOugHHjocB/giphy.gif

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Rocksteady’s Suicide Squad has Been Delayed Until 2023

According to a Bloomberg report, various sources familiar with the development have said t…