Categories: Technology

Twitter is testing different “conversation dynamics” to limit abuse and harassment

Twitter’s a weird platform. It’s a bit like going into a public place, shouting your thoughts out and hoping that people like them enough to run about repeating those thoughts. If you’re unlucky, the stuff you say might be stupid or controversial enough to have everybody shouting about how wrong you are right to your face.

And that’s one of the best and worst things about Twitter, really. Sometimes, having people call you out on your bullshit in a very public way can be a fantastic wake-up call. Other times, it can just be harassment and dogpiling – and the line between them is fine. To remove the harassment part of the equation, Twitter is making some drastic changes to how conversations on its app work. It’ll make Twitter a very different platform to use – by allowing people to choose who can reply to their tweets. In effect, it’ll allow for four options when tweeting: Global, Group, Panel, and Statement.

“Global” will function as all tweets do now: When a user tweets, it’ll be sent out into the world, allowing all and sundry to reply. With the “group” option, only those who you follow will be able to reply to tweets. With Panel, only a pre-selected number of participants can engage in the digital conversation, while Statement won’t let anyone reply. According to Twitter, it’s meant to curb targeted online harassment.

Says Suzanne Xie, Director of Product Management at Twitter: “The reason we’re doing this is, if we think about what conversation means on Twitter. Right now, public conversation on Twitter is you tweet something everyone in the world will see and everyone can reply, or you can have a very private conversation in a DM. So there’s an entire spectrum of conversations that we don’t see on Twitter yet.”

I’m a little ambivalent about these changes – which seem to be taking Twitter ever closer to Facebook and group interactions. On the one hand it’d be nice to use the platform to say something without the worry of being dogpiled by people whose vocal opinions run contra to your own. It also means that fake news can propagate without comments to counter or dispute it. On the other, Twitter already functions as an echo chamber – but if this means less grumpy people on the platform overall, then it’ll be a positive change.

Last Updated: January 9, 2020

Share
Geoffrey Tim

Editor. I'm old, grumpy and more than just a little cynical. One day, I found myself in possession of a NES, and a copy of Super Mario Bros 3. It was that game that made me realise that games were more than just toys to idly while away time - they were capable of being masterpieces. I'm here now, looking for more of those masterpieces.

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

  • Gaming

Destiny 2: Where is Xur (and whats he got for sale?) – January 17

There are still those who are willing to get up at the crack of dusk and boot up their console…

18 hours ago
  • Comics & Toys

Hot Toys Batman Beyond is ready to be Gotham’s Tomorrow Knight

Batman Beyond is finally getting the sixth scale action figure that he deserves from Hot Toys. Kind of, provided that…

19 hours ago
  • Technology

Instagram’s plan to hide faked images is impacting real artists

Instagram's plans to block fake images is having the unintended consequence of affecting digital artists

20 hours ago
  • Entertainment

Lucasfilm wants Taika Waititi to make a Star Wars movie

Lucasfilm is pursuing one of the biggest up and coming names and trying to convince Thor: Ragnarok's Taika Waititi to…

21 hours ago
  • Gaming

Modern Warfare’s first season will be extended by around two weeks

Infinity Ward has stated that this is to allow players to catch up with all the bonus content and events…

22 hours ago
  • Opinion

The good, the bad and the ugly of the week – 17 January 2020

The fact there is a top hat implies there is a bottom hat as well.

22 hours ago