Flamebait Friday Debate: AMD or Nvidia?

1 min read


Kepler, SLI, Crossfire, CUDA, OpenCL, Eyefinity, 3D Vision Surround, GeForce, Radeon…these confusing terms could mean nothing to you; or as so, so many of you are dyed-in-the-wool hardcore Pc gamers, they could well define your existence. Back in 2006, CPU maker AMD snapped up ATi, taking over the brand, setting it up for greatness – while Nvidia is responsible for ushering in the GPU age with its GeForce 256.

It’s been a game of one-upmanship between the two companies since the days of the Nvidia’s Riva TNT and AT’s Rage – but they’ve each settled in to a niche. AMD’s goal is to offer you the most bang for your buck instead of ultimate performance. This comes, sometimes, at a cost; AMD’s driver support is perhaps a little slower than the competition. Nvidia, on the other hand, aims for the bleeding edge, with great driver support – but you’ll pay through your nostrils for their top end products.

The question is…which do you favour?

(Ps: Don’t feel left out, consolites; Microsoft’s Xbox 360 is ATi/AMD powered, while the PlayStation3 runs off Nvidia graphics hardware)

Last Updated: July 20, 2012

Geoffrey Tim

Editor. I'm old, grumpy and more than just a little cynical. One day, I found myself in possession of a NES, and a copy of Super Mario Bros 3. It was that game that made me realise that games were more than just toys to idly while away time - they were capable of being masterpieces. I'm here now, looking for more of those masterpieces.

Check Also

The 2018 Razer Blade is the powerful compact laptop you’ve been asking for

Razer's new 2018 Blade is a much improved laptop in terms of design and power, and remains…