Home Gaming Grand Theft Auto 4 – Reviewed

Grand Theft Auto 4 – Reviewed

13 min read

By Etienne Vlok


So, it’s finally here. After waiting for 4 years since its original late 2004 release on PS2, Grand Theft Auto has finally made the leap to next-gen. Along the way, we’ve seen all sorts of shenanigans: Peter Moore tattooing his arm with a GTA IV logo would categorize as ‘memorable’; Jack Thompson blaming everything that ails America today on the series would probably slot into ‘annoying.’ But when all is said and done, these are mere sideshow distractions to the main event.

GTA IV is the best game released on any platform this year, and it will take a monumental effort to take this label away from it. The sheer scope of activities available, combined with extremely polished gameplay in nearly every respect ensures that GTA IV has no equal when it comes to free-roaming titles. Even the plot and characters take a step up to match the top-notch design and technical achievements of the game, finally delivering a GTA experience that tells a truly epic crime saga, yet still manages to be funny in a lot of places – avoiding some of the more absurd plot points found in previous entries in the series.


GTA IV centres on Nico Bellic, an Easter European immigrant who is lured to Liberty City by promises of living the high life by his cousin, Roman. Fresh off the boat, he discovers that Roman was lying: he’s running a small taxi company, living in a dilapidated apartment, and has none of the wealth he claimed to have. From this rude introduction, Nico initially starts out with the goal of making a new start in America, but finds himself quickly drawn back into the underworld of being an enforcer for the Russian mob, who has a strong presence in Broker (analogous of Brooklyn in the  real New York), the area you start out it. Suffice to say that Nico’s hands are by no means clean, and his coming to Liberty City is as much an attempt to escape his past as it is to find prosperity. However, try as he might, his involvement with criminal elements quickly escalate, and the cousins Bellic find Liberty City a very unwelcome place fairly quickly. What follows is a truly well written series of betrayals, bloody tales of revenge, and ultimately the complete loss of innocence Nico experiences – as he often laments, at the cost of his soul. This actually becomes the central focus of the game, and lends the game a dramatic depth I would never have expected from a GTA title. With this release, it can truthfully be said that the series has grown up, acknowledging that the actions of its’ protagonist is, essentially, wrong.

The game features a huge cast of interesting and colourful characters: from Roman Bellic, perpetually in debt but always prepared with the next big scheme to make him rich; completely stoned Jamaican drug dealers and violence-prone Russian hoods; to some more calculating foes that would spoil the plot if I were to reveal them. 

Nico Bellic himself is an interesting protagonist, as mentioned above. Looking like a fairly decent guy when you first meet him, you can see he is a man running from his past. As the plot progresses and his history is revealed, you come to realize that the choices he made in his past – and will make again during the run of the game – creates a character that is more than the stereotypical moral blank slate. His choices and tragic spiral into the criminal element of Liberty City is actually tragic to behold.

A final note on the plot: it is at heart a serious indictment of the American Dream. Presenting you with a hopeful immigrant coming to find greener pastures in America, the brutal reality of seeing a corrupt, violent and xenophobic society assimilate the newcomers speaks volumes to what people like Jack Thompson sees wrong in America, but erroneously places the blame on games. It reminds of something Alan Moore once wrote. To paraphrase: if people are wondering what happened to the American Dream, GTA IV loudly answers “it came true.”

Understand me....

As mentioned above, the scope of the game is without compare. Mostly, you’ll spend your time travelling through the city in the myriad cars available to you, although you can also use helicopters as a means of travel (no planes, this time around.) As always, the game presents you with an astounding variety of cars, each handling differently. One of the true highlights of the game remains the helter-skelter improvisation you engage in when trying to escape police pursuit. It makes for action packed – not to mention highly entertaining and visceral – gaming. You have the option of the traditional camera view, behind and above your vehicle, but there is also a cinematic view. While impractical, it does tend to give one a very good look at the action.

Speaking of action, allow me to mention one mission in the middle of the game that leads to one of the most awesome action set pieces I’ve ever played. It’s a bank robbery gone horribly wrong, with the escape becoming a running gunfight in the streets, much like the one in Michael Mann’s Heat. It is bloody, but it’s awesome (bloody awesome would be accurate too.)

This may be an appropriate time to delve into the awesome graphics for this game. I reviewed on the 360, and I have to say I am completely blown away by the graphics. While there is some minor pop-in and minute clipping problems, this is completely dwarfed by the beautifully detailed and rendered cityscape of the redesigned Liberty City. The facial animations in the cutscenes finally lend believability and emotion to the characters, and make all such encounters much more interesting than the mannequin-like interaction seen in previous entries in the series. Character models are detailed and the animation life-like.

Hello Ladies

The true star of the game – graphically – is Liberty City itself. It has no ‘dead space’, like the vast tracts of desert in San Andreas, so it constantly offers you something interesting to see or do. It’s divided into three major areas, unlocking as you progress into the game. Looking utterly believable and lived in, it’s a complete virtual cityscape, teeming with life – and the attention to detail is staggering. Whether it be places to buy clothes, restaurants, bowling alleys, pubs, cabarets, night clubs (complete with… exotic dancers) or sidewalk vendors – Liberty City features all of the above, and more. Seeing Star Square at night – the in-game equivalent of Times Square – is an awesome experience. As you walk through the city, you’ll see a criminal knock someone over and make off with a purse, shortly followed by an overweight policeman. You’ll see the citizens cause accidents and traffic jams, and react realistically. Nico will look both ways before smashing the window of a car he’s trying to steal. Beggars and cocaine addicts will stumble through the alleys, begging for money. Citizens will impede your progress when you commit crimes. In short, you’ll see people living their daily lives.

image You can take ‘regular’ jobs, like being a taxi driver. You can hack into the police database from one of the various internet cafes’ (named tw@, in typical Rockstar humour) and complete the bounties on the ten most wanted criminals in Liberty. You can register a profile on an online dating service, or converse via e-mail with Mama Bellic back in Russia. You can have a girlfriend and go on dates with her, which includes fully implemented bowling and pool minigames; call up Roman and go out drinking for the evening, ultimately getting drunk and having to stumble back to your car. By interacting with various characters in manner, you can become close friends with them, eventually unlocking a special ability: for instance, your Jamaican friend delivers cut-price weapons from the trunk of a car, while another will send two hoods along with you on missions as backup.

This game is a better ‘life’ simulator than The Sims, in my opinion, since it gives the player the opportunity to actively perform actions themselves, as opposed to merely ordering your Sims around. In this regard, GTA IV offers up much, much more than many other games can ever claim to do, and consistently makes whatever you are busy with fun.

The combat features a cover system that works surprisingly well, being activated by clicking the right bumper on the controller. Nico will stick to walls, and alter his position automatically as you approach edges or gaps in cover. You can blind fire, or lean out and take aim – basically, a classic Gears of War style cover system is implemented. It’s a big improvement of the run and gun mechanics of the previous games, and gels very well with an AI th
at can definitely pose a threat in large numbers.

The ‘wanted’ system works differently in GTA IV, with police searching for you within an indicated radius of where you were spotted. If you can escape the radius and avoid detection, the police presence will disappear. If you are spotted again, the radius relocates to the last area you were spotted in. As such, it’s much more important to hide than simply outrun the law. Switching cars in secluded locations becomes a valuable technique to escape, since the traditional spray-job is a lot trickier to achieve, with these locations now few and far between.

The game features a number of innovations that seems so natural and fits in so well with the times, it’s a wonder no one has implemented it before. You have access to a GPS that plots routes to your objectives, and recalculates as necessary when you veer off-course. Your cellphone will become your best friend, being the way in which you receive phone calls and text messages that leads to new missions that advance the plot. By accepting or rejecting certain missions, a branching element is built into the plot, which means the game can play out differently on various playthroughs, depending on your choices.

You can call up contacts, merely to chat or to invite them out for a night on the town. Hell, you can even call 911 and have them send a patrol car along to your present location! (I did this a few times – it’s the easiest way to hijack a police cruiser.) You can even alter the ringtone of your phone, for crying out loud!

The multiplayer aspect is also accessed through your cellphone. At the time I was playing the game for review, there weren’t a lot of people online yet, so I wasn’t able to review it fully. Look for this to be rectified by a follow-up review that deals specifically with the multiplayer aspect of the game to be released by (hopefully) the weekend.

On the audio front, the game features very good voice acting, and a host of mock radio stations, with quite a few big names appearing on playlists. Black Sabbath to Queen, Miles Davis to ELO and everything in between all make an appearance. Radio Vladivostok! is a particularly hilarious Russian station – given the Borat treatment. My favourite remains the chat radio stations, which serve up truly hilarious content. The mayoral candidate intoning “Remember, parents: the internet is a series of tubes, and on the other end of that tube is a terrorist who wants to insert his privates into your living room” is side-splitting – and there are a lot more gems to be heard. There’s even a lawyer who likes to blame all the ails of the city on violent video games.


On that last note, the game definitely has its tongue planted firmly in its’ cheek, and pokes fun at almost any sacred cow you can imagine. The humor is often subtle, and sometimes pretty dark, but guaranteed to be funny. Look at the ads on billboards for prime examples, or go watch some TV shows in your apartment to see Paris Hilton lampooned to hilarious effect. There’s even an achievement for 360 players called “Warm Coffee” – you earn it by convincing your girlfriend to invite you up to her apartment for some caffeinated beverage which may (or may not) possibly be hot…

On that note, it’s definitely worth mentioning (in bold lettering) that this game is intended for a mature audience. With the amount of swearing, over-the-top violence and sexuality available to explore, this game is not intended for younger players. The latter, particularly, involves a lot of (virtual) skin being on display and booty being liberally shaken.

A few closing remarks: the control scheme is very intuitive, and you’ll be moving through the mean streets of Liberty City with ease within 20 minutes of starting to play the game. Also, the load times on the Xbox are few and far between, but can take up to 10 seconds when loading up a mission. Thankfully, there is no loading when moving between various game areas.

GTA IV is as close to a perfect game as I have seen this year, and must rank in the top 5 games that I have ever played. It is polished to near perfection, and gives the player instant enjoyment, no matter what he/she chooses to do. It was definitely worth the wait, and is easily the best GTA yet released. Looking at a playing time in excess of 30 hours – more likely approaching 50 – this game will keep you busy for a long time, and the sheer amount of activities to engage in delivers tremendous replay value. Unless you dislike the mature subject matter, I can’t think of a reason not to own this game. Go and buy it now.

Graphics: 95%
Gameplay: 100 %
Originality: 100 %
Tilt: 100 %
Overall: 100 %

While it feels strange to do so, this is the first review for LazyGamer where I feel comfortable in claiming that a perfect score of 100% can be justified. It’s just that good.

Last Updated: April 29, 2008


  1. PS3Gamer

    April 29, 2008 at 08:15

    I have to ask, what platform was this reviewed on?


  2. Lupus

    April 29, 2008 at 08:15

    Would originality really be 100% if you think about it? It is the 4th title in a series of games that has been around since 1997?


  3. Etienne Vlok

    April 29, 2008 at 08:45

    Sorry. I make a passing reference to it, but this is the 360 version.

    While the core gameplay mechanics may have evolved, the sheer amount of new ideas bought to the table is enough to earn that, in my opinion.


  4. Etienne Vlok

    April 29, 2008 at 08:56

    Sorry for double posting.

    I also think the 100 for originality was influenced by the multiplayer, which, although I don’t review it here as yet, I did try my hand at. So a large part of the score for originality comes from that, at least in my eyes.


  5. koldFU5iON

    April 29, 2008 at 09:29

    No previous GTA comes close to what GTA IV brings to the table. play it and you’ll see what I mean


  6. Retro

    April 29, 2008 at 09:43

    Been playing this since this weekend now. I’ve never been a fan of GTA, so maybe that’s why I’m a bit confused with all these high ratings. Yes, the game is great, but it’s not perfect. The pop-ins and clipping problems are too many to just get ignored. And like someone said… 100% for originality? We’ve played this game before, it just looks better, sounds better, plays better and has lots more features. Even my gf asked why the graphics doesn’t look better for a game scoring this high.


  7. LazySAGamer

    April 29, 2008 at 09:57

    The game was only released last night so how have you been playing since the weekend?

    Also you have to take into consideration that you are trying to compare a huge open world game to a closed gamed when it comes to graphics….


  8. doobiwan

    April 29, 2008 at 10:49

    It always comes down to how one scores, which makes me cross about the reviews. If a site regularly gives 10’s to great games with “overlookable flaws” that’s fine, but for a site like IGN to give it 100% smacks of double standards.

    I’m not saying it’s not a good game, I just think points systems are silly.


  9. PillsburyDeeBoy

    April 29, 2008 at 10:50

    ‘It would take a monumental effort to strip GTA of it’s title as game of the year’. Agreed. Very true. We’ll see come June 12th, say I:). Anyhow, I must be honest, I’m far less concerned about how this game ‘plays’ in opposition to what this game ‘says’. Rockstar is the de facto controversial mouthpiece in our industry, and I pray they push the bar real hard.


  10. Lonewolf

    April 29, 2008 at 10:51

    Ur kidding. Right?!?! Read the Damn article!!


  11. PillsburyDeeBoy

    April 29, 2008 at 10:53

    Agreed to the extent that most gamers don’t care enough to invest in a game’s narrative let alone immerse themselves in reading the reviews, so a points system is a necessary evil.


  12. Lonewolf

    April 29, 2008 at 10:59

    Yes. You have to consider that this game is hugely open world. Which means that the game engine has a lot to deal with as well as the gfx. And this game has been released world wide on the 29th(today). So I doubt you have been playing the right game.

    I’m not a GTA fan boy, but giving a game 100% rating has to do with the elements the game is made up of. Whether it is original or not. If the game is enjoyable and brings new things to the table and is developed pretty well to sort out most if not all of the in-game bugs. Then in my opinion it should score a high score. 10/10 means perfect. Nothing is perfect. But this game comes damn well close. So 10/10 is justified.


  13. Retro

    April 29, 2008 at 11:12

    Oh please, the game has been available to download since last Wednesday already. And spare me the piracy talk…


  14. Lonewolf

    April 29, 2008 at 11:34

    Well I guess that labels u as one of those id**ts then.

    And maby think before you post next time. Cause your previous post leads me to believe that you know nothing about game mechanics which quite directly makes any argument on your side, futile and irrelevant. Maby its a good idea to only comment on things you are sure of, or know is a fact. Besides, Piracy is FUN!!! …….. bleh


  15. Lonewolf

    April 29, 2008 at 11:36

    I only read what the articles say. I dont base my choice on the scoring system 😛


  16. Retro

    April 29, 2008 at 11:37

    lol, so just because I download games, means I don’t know anything about it? Should people rather listen to some fanboy who never even played it yet?


  17. Fred

    April 29, 2008 at 11:41

    Go play with your pirated goods , your opinion doesn’t count here. And you still complain about the quality of the product ….


  18. Etienne Vlok

    April 29, 2008 at 11:46

    Look, all the talk about rating systems aside, I agree that sites that hand out 10/10 on a regular basis irks me as well. That said, I think I’ve personally been harsh on games in the past, and Lazy reviews in general don’t mark up games just for the hell of it.

    With that said, please don’t see this post as attacking anyone. As a reviewer, I’ve merely stated my opinion. I bought the game myself, and I don’t regard myself as a hardcore GTA fan. At one point last year, I was even considering giving it a skip.

    GTA IV has flaws, but if you take a step back and see everything they did right and bring to the table, I feel that a 100/100 rating is justified. Even if I were to drop, I wouldn’t rate it lower than 98/100, so you are arguing about a mere 2 percentage points here.

    Everyone is fully entitled to their own views on the matter, but I feel I have enough reasons, besides those mentioned above, to justify a 100/100 review.

    All that said, I welcome any constructive criticism on my reviews, and I thank everyone who has provided such in the comments.


  19. bokka1

    April 29, 2008 at 11:48

    I hate pirates you bunch of worthless leeches.

    We are trying to build a healthy games community in this country then some stupid assholes f**k it up for the rest of us.


  20. Lonewolf

    April 29, 2008 at 11:51

    a fan boy? Me? LOL! Good luck.
    and never played it?!!? I went to a mid-night launch with a mate last nite and played it till 2am.
    And I was talking about your comment on the gfx. Quote”why the graphics doesn’t look better for a game scoring this high.”
    So I guess ur not only wrong, but stupid too??!?! Just asking?


  21. Etienne Vlok

    April 29, 2008 at 11:58

    Agreed that one of the very few contenders that can topple GTA IV from numerous Game of the Year awards is MGS4.


  22. Retro

    April 29, 2008 at 12:04

    Did you actually read the whole comment? Nice of you to only quote a part of it. If you go read it again you’ll notice that I said my gf asked that. So what am I wrong about again?


  23. Messiah

    April 29, 2008 at 12:18

    Retro, I hope your console RRODs on you!


  24. evilredzombie

    April 29, 2008 at 19:02

    As someone who does a review once in a blue moon don’t think you can truly review any game if you have not completed it….but that’s just my opinion

    evilredzombie’s last blog post..Review – Dark Sector PS3


  25. LazySAGamer

    April 29, 2008 at 19:22

    I don’t agree with that opinion to be honest..

    I reviewed Jumper after 40 minutes, the game was terrible and I wasn’t going to suffer through the whole game before reviewing it..

    To ‘complete’ GTA IV will take weeks, the big question is how far do you have to go before you can review it?


  26. evilredzombie

    April 29, 2008 at 20:02

    Yes, GTA will take ages. However I have played games that are brilliant the 1st few hours and then completely drop to a worthless pile of code and Visa versa.Games that start off an utter disgrace and after the 2nd hour pick up to a amazing title. What I would do in this case is say I’m reviewing the game based on x amount completed or x amount of hours played… That being said…I’m just a gamer, and once again this is just my opinion and the way I like to approach things

    evilredzombie’s last blog post..Review – Dark Sector PS3


  27. doobiwan

    April 29, 2008 at 20:16


    I’ll sort of agree with Lazy. You can review a bad game in about an hour.

    I however agree with EZR about “good reviews”. You can’t say the whole thing is awesome if you don’t finish it. Although I don’t think you need to include all the side stuff.

    A good example is Yatzee’s Condemned 2 review.


  28. Etienne Vlok

    April 30, 2008 at 07:30

    I put in about 25 hours before writing this review.


  29. evilredzombie

    April 30, 2008 at 08:26

    Did you get a copie before release? 25hours.. then its justified

    evilredzombie’s last blog post..Review – Dark Sector PS3


  30. Etienne Vlok

    April 30, 2008 at 11:06

    Yeah, I played over the weekend.


  31. David

    May 1, 2008 at 23:09

    This Game Rocks I’ve been Playing it for the past three days since I got at the midnight lunch at Northgate BT games. I’ve been playing none stop for three days only stopping to sleep and eat and I am only 49.77% through the game, looks like its going to take a while


  32. RivaZA

    May 1, 2008 at 23:43

    What about Assassin’s Creed? That is an open world game and easily has better graphics then many closed games.


  33. doobiwan

    May 2, 2008 at 02:06

    Hmm, Can I lead Flamebait Friday here? 😉

    I’ve only put 6 hours into SP so far, and an hour in MP, and there is no way I’d give it 10/10. It’s good, but it’s the benchmark for “overhyped”.

    doobiwan’s last blog post..The Games that made the consoles


  34. goodman

    October 26, 2008 at 01:07

    👿 this game fucking sucks it is not woth how much i paid for it. that dude lonewolf is a fuckin dumbass and dont no what he is talkin about


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

10 Considerations Before Committing To Hire, Rent  Or Purchase Of Industrial Floor Cleaning Equipment

Are you looking to optimise the performance and productivity if the cleaning regime at you…