In its lawsuit against NetEase, PUBG Corp argued that cosmetics have an effect on gameplay

3 min read
0

cosmetics

Many people (often, myself included) will defend loot boxes in games when they’re home to little but cosmetic fare. Sure, they may cost a bit of money or show up as an in-game reward, but they contain little more than vanity items, so shouldn’t make any appreciable difference to the game-playing experience.

The developers have PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds have argued the reverse. They suggest that cosmetic items found in their games do have a direct effect on gameplay.

For a bit of context, the publisher and developer is currently embroiled in a bit of litigation with Chinese company NetEase over its own mobile PUBG clones. NetEase’s Rules of Survival lifts not just PUBG’s mechanics, but a few of its vanity items too. To bolster their case against NetEase, they’ve argued that the vanity items are important to gameplay, and should be protected. They’ve stated that in-game cosmetics and their cosmetics economy are critical gameplay elements

“In addition to armor, the user can pick up additional clothing, such as jackets, pants, hats, goggles, glasses, gloves, masks, shoes and shirts. The pieces of clothing do not affect gameplay but is an artistic expression that provides the player with a visually diverse gameplay experience as well as allowing each player to express him/herself.

However, clothing does affect gameplay in terms of camouflage. Clothing can be used to assist the player to blend in with the environment, making the player less visually detectable.

The player must visually detect an opposing player without any aid other than equipment found in gameplay, such as an optical scope. Thus, the colors and stylings of the clothing found in BATTLEGROUNDS adds to the rich tapestry of the gameplay experience while permitting artistic expression.”

This flies in the face of previous statements from the company that say that cosmetics don’t affect gameplay, but anything to win a case, I guess. They’ve probably inadvertently helped bolster arguments against loot boxes in any form as well.

Read  Bluehole is sick of hearing that PUBG is broken, so they launched a website

Last Updated: April 10, 2018

Geoffrey Tim

Editor. I'm old, grumpy and more than just a little cynical. One day, I found myself in possession of a NES, and a copy of Super Mario Bros 3. It was that game that made me realise that games were more than just toys to idly while away time - they were capable of being masterpieces. I'm here now, looking for more of those masterpieces.

Check Also

Activision is being hit with a false advertising lawsuit for shutting down Guitar Hero TV

The most recent Guitar Hero was a decent game, though I regret the R2k I spent on the thin…