One console future is a very bad thing

34 second read


Destructoid have posted an article explaining why they think that a one console future is something that should be avoided at all costs.

They make some very good points, discussing the problems that would arise if there was to be no competition. They do however go on to discuss when a one console future would actually make sense and why. It’s an interesting read, so click on the link below and check it out for yourself.

article: Destructoid

Last Updated: May 12, 2008

Nick De Bruyne

Video games writer, editor and critic since '08. Living and breathing video games, movies and cars since the 80s. Follow me on Twitter if you love tons of gaming talk, and @pennyworthrevs for fun stuff and links.

  • I agree…think telkom, eskom. We need at least 2 big players

    Evilredzombie’s last blog post..Gears of War 2 gameplay

  • David

    one console future, I think it is a really bad idea. I think having a few different consoles but not more than three different types is better because the different console creators compete with each other by trying to make their console increasingly better. The more the different console creators compete the better the consoles become, if there was only one console there would be no competing with other types of consoles and with out that competing the one console future won’t know how to make their console increasingly better if they don’t have any other console technologies to base new ideas on and steal ideas. ❓ 💡 😕

Check Also

NVIDIA wants its GPUS with gamers rather than cryptominers

though its a hollow sentiment because it's toyght to control who you sell to, Nvidia has u…