Warner Bros is now the sole owner of Superman

3 min read

If there is one thing that can stop the man of steel, it’s not Kryptonite, but rather, Legalnite. Or more specifically, lawsuits. The last son of Krypton has been in court houses for longer than Judge Judy in recent years, as Warner Bros and the estate of the creators of the character, have battled it out for the rights to the iconic first superhero.

And now, Warner Bros has won.

A couple of months ago, the heirs of co-creator Joe Schuster filed to have the copyright on the character terminated, but failed miserably to do so. The court ruled in favour of the WB, but it wasn’t long before the estate of the other co-creator, Jerry Siegel tried to do the exact same thing. According to THR via Coming Soon, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overruled on the decision made by a lower court several years ago, and say that it was wrong to deny WB the rights to the character from a 2001 trial that had already occured.

Or in layman’s terms, Warner Bros now owns Superman lock, stock and barrell. The Siegels had at one point been the rights holders of “Superman’s defining characteristics” which included “his costume, Clark Kent and his origin story, as described in the first editions of Action Comics,” but with a reversed ruling, they won’t be cashing in any more royalty cheques from WB and DC Comics.

Read  The DCEU’s Flashpoint movie may have found its directors in Spider-Man: Homecoming writing duo

Which also means that WB can do what they want with the character, which is good news for the upcoming Man of Steel. While I was always appalled at the lack of credit that DC gave Schuster and Siegel over their character, before finally caving in and adding that blurb to the character in various media in the 70s, I’ve always felt that WB has been in the right on this case.

DC Comics, who are owned by WB, bought the rights to Superman decades ago, because he had been created under a contract that Siegel and Schuster were paid for. It’s as simple as that, and a fact of life. If there is any silver lining to the various court cases though, it’s that we never had to sit through a Tim Burton directed Superman film that would have starred Nicolas Cage as the Man of purple steel.

Talk about dodging a bullet.


Last Updated: January 11, 2013

Darryn Bonthuys

Something wrong gentlemen? You come here prepared to read the words of a madman, and instead found a lunatic obsessed with comics, Batman and Raul Julia's M Bison performance in the 1994 Street Fighter movie? Fine! Keep your bio! In fact, now might be a good time to pray to it!

  • Rincethis

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Oh Nicholas Cage, crazy guy .

    • Admiral Chief Troll Erwin

      Damn, thats horrible

  • Suck it Disney. I saw a Spiderman cartoon on the disney channel at my nephews house and he drove a motorbike that can transform. WHY is he riding a bike??? Probably to sell toys. Oh and Agent Coleson was dating aunt May! Realy Disney???

    • Admiral Chief Troll Erwin

      Disney channel is HORRIBLE. I also saw a bit of that while channel hopping after a braai at my in-laws (before passing out from food overindulgence – win). That show is uber lame.

  • Admiral Chief Troll Erwin

    Oh Shucks, its Schuster

  • Ultimo_Cleric

    Is that picture of Nic Cage legit? If so……dodged a bullet indeed….

    • Darryn_Bonthuys

      Yep, from around the time Tim Burton was working on a Superman flick in the 90s. There’s another costume, which looks like the bastard love child of tron and a rave party.

  • Well, now we are assured for countless films and spin-offs.

Check Also

The DCEU’s Flashpoint movie may have found its directors in Spider-Man: Homecoming writing duo

Although announced all the way back in 2015, DC Comics' Flashpoint movie has been running …