Home Reviews We review Brave (3D) – Entertaining but short on Pixar originality

We review Brave (3D) – Entertaining but short on Pixar originality

5 min read
7

Not only is Brave Pixar’s first family adventure with a female lead but it’s also the first film from the celebrated animation studio to fit the “magical” folk tale mould. Understandably then, expectations around the movie were high. And while Brave is certainly watchable, unfortunately it doesn’t deliver the full Pixar dazzle.

To describe it another way, Brave doesn’t display any of the Pixar inventiveness that makes you chuckle, or sends your heart soaring. You know, the intricately thought-out world creation; the surprisingly sly satire of our world; all the unexpected narratives (superheroes sent into hiding by endless lawsuits; a robot trash compactor that craves love; monsters that harvest children’s screams as a source of energy). There’s none of that engaging novelty in Brave.

Instead, the film feels more like a product of Pixar’s parent company, Walt Disney Pictures. Or, more specifically, it feels like one of those animated movies immediately preceding and following Disney’s late 80s/early 90s resurgence, which ran from The Little Mermaid through to The Lion King. Think movies like Basil the Great Mouse Detective and Mulan. They’re entertaining, but definitely flawed – often in terms of conventional plots and rushed conclusions. Brave is a similar mixed bag.

Pixar’s latest takes a while to get going. Set in the rugged Highlands of Medieval Scotland, Brave’s plot is powered by the antagonism between free-spirited princess Merida (voiced by Kelly Macdonald) and her straight-laced mother, Queen Elinor (Emma Thompson). Whereas Merida would rather spend her days climbing cliffs and practising archery, Elinor is intent on morphing her daughter into a mannered lady fully capable of handling the diplomatic duties ignored by the childish Scottish lords – including Merida’s burly but soft-hearted father, King Fergus (Billy Connolly). Matters come to a head when clan leaders Dingwall, MacGuffin and Macintosh (Robbie Coltrane, Kevin McKidd and Craig Ferguson) arrive to arrange a betrothal between their sons and Merida. Furious and desperate, our heroine turns to an unreliable, bear-obsessed witch (Julie Walters). The result is a spell that unleashes chaos.

To get to this point in the film, though, the audience has had to endure a series of tedious arguments, exasperated sighs and eye rolls. And it’s not like we haven’t seen this form of teenage rebellion a hundred times before. It’s dull and predictable – especially when you contrast it with 2011’s Tangled (also from Disney) which put a much more novel passive-aggressive spin on parent-child conflict.

Anyway, once Merida’s spell is cast, Brave becomes a lot more fun and action-packed. Although the many night time scenes are a bit too dark in 3D, there’s no denying the beauty of Brave’s animation – both in terms of the setting and character design. The bear that accompanies Merida on her quest to break the spell is especially well-animated, featuring the facial expressions of a dejected, but cute, cuddly Labrador.

Unsurprisingly, once it breaks away from the clichéd sulking and outbursts, Brave also becomes a lot warmer emotionally, and more affecting. I confess that I cried at least once, although it’s barely a sniff on the Up Scale of Upsetting.

On this note though, a big problem in Brave is the time span of events. If The Dark Knight Rises felt like it was set over too long a period, here things are too condensed. Merida has less than 2 days to break the spell and restore normality. Although the character curiously doesn’t seem stressed at all about this deadline, 48 hours isn’t nearly enough time to explore the full dramatic potential of the situation. A highlight scene in the film is a light-hearted fishing sequence that suddenly turns harrowing, and Brave could really have done with more of these moments to convincingly depict the mending of a damaged relationship… while an even greater danger looms. Instead, all too soon, we arrive at the climax, and blip, it’s all over.

Even setting Brave’s events over a week would have been improved matters. Tension would build as Merida is pursued on multiple sides, and has to contend with the terrifying, flick-flacking transformation of a loved one she can neither predict nor stop. But then again, perhaps this is all a little too deep and dark for a family film watched by many young children? For the record, there are already several intense moments in Brave that could frighten the under-5s.

As a side note, it hasn’t been well publicised, but Brave’s initial (female) writer-director Brenda Chapman left the project during its development, citing “creative differences.” This departure may explain a few jarring tonal shifts in Brave, as well as a couple of intriguing concepts that are mentioned and then evidently abandoned. For example, the queen knows where the witch’s hovel is, suggesting that she too has visited the crone. However, this plot point is never explored further.

And this really is the overriding sensation you receive from Brave – that the film has consistently steered away from opportunities to be memorably stand-out and smart. Instead of being, well, brave, the film has stuck to the safe, slick, stripped-down route. And frankly that’s not enough to win the hearts of audiences, given that this mostly sober adventure is competing against the madcap, colourful Ice Age and Madagascar franchises. Brave is watchable but far from remarkable.

Last Updated: August 15, 2012

7 Comments

  1. chris

    August 15, 2012 at 13:42

    Glad to see I wasn’t the only one that couldn’t see! I will really recommend anyone to watch this in 2D rather than 3D. As the movie takes place at night 85% of the movie… If you have a cinema that is not setup perfectly, you will leave the cinema wanting your money back… The 3D is not used to great affect in any case…

    Reply

    • DarthofZA

      August 16, 2012 at 12:44

      I think if you can’t see, it means you’re using the old glasses. Go buy a pair of the new ones, they’re like R5 only, and make all the difference!

      Reply

      • Kervyn Cloete

        August 16, 2012 at 13:22

        Nah, some movies are horrible in dark scenes, and sometimes cinemas also forget to recalibrate projectors from 2D to 3D, resulting in overly dark images.

        Reply

        • DarthofZA

          August 16, 2012 at 16:14

          I used to say the same thing, until I used one of the new glasses. Case in point, the new Spiderman. The first 2 times I watched it, I used the old glasses, the third time though, I used the new glasses. With the new glasses, I felt no need to remove them the whole movie.

          Reply

          • Kervyn Cloete

            August 16, 2012 at 16:20

            Pray tell, what do you mean by new and old glasses? Because as far as I know (and have experienced myself), Ster Kinekor and Nu Metro have been using the same type of 3D glasses since they launched RealD a couple years back. The only new thing has been the clip ons for people with prescription glasses.

      • chris

        August 16, 2012 at 20:36

        Actually I bought a new pair on the same day I watched it 😉
        It was at ster kinekor sandton… And it was the first day of release, so I think they haven’t figured out the right contrast/brightness ratios yet. Having said that, I have read on a lot of websites that this movie is particularly bad- considering it takes place mostly at night, but even more so at cinemas that is not correctly tuned in…

        @facebook-610830836:disqus The new glasses have a slightly better frame. Looks more like sunglasses than something out of Back to the Future 2. I do not however think it makes that big a difference, but I can be woefully mistaken. I still don’t think that 3D is all that it’s cracked up to be, I mean for what you’re paying it’s actually in my humble opinion, a ripoff… If done right however I have found it quite entertaining… How to train your dragon was a joyride in 3D, I liked thor since it gave some amazing depth to some of the scenes, especially in Asgard. And funny enough, cloudy with a chance of meatballs used the 3D to great affect. However if asked whether it’s worth almost double the ticket price, definitely NO.

        Reply

        • Kervyn Cloete

          August 17, 2012 at 08:15

          I’ve only ever seen/used those sunglasses type 3D glasses for the last 2 years.

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

First Cruella reviews praise Emma Stone’s portrayal of Disney’s iconic villain

Reviews of Disney's new Cruella are praising the performance of Emma Stone's scene-stealin…