Home Entertainment DEADPOOL 2 loses director Tim Miller due to “creative differences” with Ryan Reynolds

DEADPOOL 2 loses director Tim Miller due to “creative differences” with Ryan Reynolds

3 min read


Besides for just proving to Hollywood suits that not every superhero movie needs to be family friendly, one of the most satisfying things about watching  Deadpool become a raging critical and commercial success earlier in the year was that it was a true passion project. For years, while Fox kept saying no to or butchering adaptations of the fan favourite character, star Ryan Reynolds and director Tim Miller were the ones who just kept on pushing on until they got the movie made they wanted to make it.

Seems that only one of them will keep on doing that for the sequel though.

Deadline reported over the weekend that Miller has now vacated the director’s chair for the upcoming sequel to Deadpool. According to their sources the unexpected departure was due to “mutual creative differences” between the director and Reynolds. There are no further details as to what these differences actually were, but the report stresses that there there’s no bad blood between the pair and that the split was amicable.

In fact, Miller still has such a good relationship with Fox that it’s expected that he will jump right into directing another big project for them, the feature film adaptation of Daniel Suarez’s cyber thriller novel Influx. That project already has a script by Dawn of the Planet of the Apes‘ Mark Bomback, and Fox are positioning it as the start of a new trilogy.


Interestingly enough, Miller had never officially signed on to the Deadpool sequel, but with its record-breaking success ($782 million worldwide gross on a $58 million budget; the biggest X-Men film of all time; highest domestic grossing R-rated movie of all time) everybody just assumed that he would.

Deadpool had been his live-action feature film directing debut, after just being a visual effects artist for many years. In fact, it was Miller leaking the incredibly popular Deadpool CGI test reel he had created that proved to Fox that there was a market for this and that he could make that movie. And what a movie it was!

But all of that just means that whomever Fox and Reynolds – who also acts as producer on the project – pick to replace Miller, is going to have some seriously big shoes to fill. Up until now the biggest talk surrounding Deadpool 2 was who would be cast in the roles of Cable and Domino, but now there’s another wrinkle added to it.

With Fox penciling the sequel in for a 2018 release, there’s still a little bit of time to land a new director, but they can’t afford to wait around too long.

UPDATE: Since the time of writing this article, TheWrap has seemingly unearthed some details as to why Reynolds and Miller had a falling out:

We’re told the director was all set to make the sequel, which still doesn’t even have a release date. That’s allegedly in part because when Reynolds’ agents renegotiated his deal, along with a massive amount of money, the star got casting approval and other creative controls. That whole process took more time than Miller (and fans) would have liked, and it shined a spotlight on differences in vision between the two key players.

Miller, who owns a visual effects studio and we’re told did much of the polishing work on the original “Deadpool” for free, wanted more of a stylized sequel, while the actor placed his focus more on the raunchy comedy style that earned the first movie its R rating.

The casting issue also eventually came to a head over the possible booking of Kyle Chandler in the sequel. Mashable movie reporter Jeff Sneider first reported Chandler’s potential involvement with the “Deadpool” sequel during a “Meet the Movie Press” podcast, saying that the actor’s name has been “floating around for Cable for months.”

The insider close to the situation tells TheWrap that Miller wanted the “Bloodline” star to play Cable, though Reynolds did not and that the studio, ultimately, backed its marketable star.

Interesting developments.

Last Updated: October 24, 2016


  1. Gavin Mannion

    October 24, 2016 at 07:38

    This doesn’t make me happy.. as much as I loved Reynolds character in Deadpool I think a lot of what made the movie amazing was the awesome FX and stunts… how much of that was down to Miller and can anyone else do it as well as he did?


    • Archdruid Kromas

      October 24, 2016 at 07:46

      Agree with you 100%


    • miaau

      October 24, 2016 at 08:23

      Yeah, hard to know.

      I do, however, think that the raunchy comedy style was part of the charm and to lose that would be a great pity.


      • Gavin Mannion

        October 24, 2016 at 08:49

        yeah losing either side would be a serious blow….


    • For the Emperor!

      October 24, 2016 at 10:14

      Yeah, the movie just felt right on all departments. Losing any part of it is not cool, but those differences listed in the update do not seem so big to me. Unless there is something else deeper lurking that we have not heard of yet.


    • Matthew Holliday

      October 24, 2016 at 11:04

      Now that the baseline has been laid with the first movie, I think much of that work has already been done and established, so I think that part of it is already sorted.
      That extra level of continuity between the movies would have been nice though, pity he wasnt willing to play ball, instead insisting on a change to the formula.

      I think sticking to the original tone is the better idea, the dark comedy was what made the movie, going more visual centric puts them more in line with what we already have from the DC and other marvel movies.

      but like you said to miaau, losing either side is not ideal.


  2. Richard Scott

    October 24, 2016 at 07:53

    Kyle Chandler as an action film villain? no thanks. Siding with Reynolds on this one.


    • Admiral Chief

      October 24, 2016 at 08:10

      Ummm, Cable is not the villain.

      But I also don’t want to see him in this type of movie


      • Richard Scott

        October 24, 2016 at 08:18

        LOL Well shows how much I know about Cable. Still he’s not right for the part or any action film.


        • Admiral Chief

          October 24, 2016 at 08:20

          Indeed. He is too family friendly for my action tastes


          • For the Emperor!

            October 24, 2016 at 10:12

            Had to Google the actor…nope nope nope for Cable! You know who almost looks like Cable? Don’t know if he will really fit, but this guy might pull it off:


          • miaau

            October 24, 2016 at 10:25


          • Matthew Holliday

            October 24, 2016 at 11:06

            I mostly just feel like he’s just a weak comedian, not really who I pictured Cable as.

            Ron Perlman would have made a solid Cable, Dolph Lundgren even, if he new how to speak.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Review: Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard

I’ve been looking forward to watching Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard since it was announced, be…