Home Entertainment Is JJ Abrams' STAR TREK sequel headed for some Darkness?

Is JJ Abrams' STAR TREK sequel headed for some Darkness?

2 min read
9

A lot of people have been eagerly awaiting the title of the new Star Trek film, as traditionally the film’s suffix will shed some light on what its story entails. I mean, Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan indeed featured somebody named Khan and he was was indeed rather upset. And if you can’t figure out the main plot point for Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock, then I’m not even sure how you’re operating a computer right now.

But it would seem that in typical JJ Abrams fashion, the next film will not only be eschewing the traditions of numbers and colons, but will also be offering us a big fat zero when it comes to plot hints.

And for those of you who can’t stand the suspense any longer, well the new movie shall be called… Star Trek Into Darkness.

TrekMovie was the first to sniff out the new title, finding out about it from their unknown sources. The story was then given a much more emphatic confirmation when ComingSoon.net discovered that MarkMonitor, an anonymous internet registration service that Paramount has been making use of recently has secured the domain names to both www.startrekintodarkness.com and www.startrekintodarknessmovie.com, both of which are just currently blank pages.

As for the story implications… Yeah, I got nothing either (Well, there is a very dirty Kirk and Uhura joke in there, but my Momma raised me far too proper for me to make it). “Into Darkness” reveals absolutely nothing about whether or not Benedict Cumberbatch’s villain will actually be Khan Noonien Sing or Gary Mitchell, the two conflicting rumours that have been raging back and forth for the last 8 months now.

I would say that the whole “Darkness” thing would be hinting at a much more serious tone, if it wasn’t for Capt. James Tiberius Kirk himself, Chris Pine, who just last week said that they’re “not making Batman” and that there’d be much more of a “comedy” element.

When it comes to the title itself, I know that Paramount previously indicated that they wanted to ditch the old naming convention, but if there was ever a title in need of a colon, that would be it. Star Trek: Into Darkness just reads a hell of a lot better, if you ask me.

I’m hoping that Paramount still sees the errors of their grammatical ways, before making this official.

So what do you guys think of the new title?

Last Updated: September 10, 2012

Check Also

Bloodstained: Ritual of the Night sequel confirmed to be in development

The sequel to the spiritual-successor to Castlevania: Symphony of the Night will hopefully…