Home Entertainment Movie trailers spoil too much because we want them to

Movie trailers spoil too much because we want them to

6 min read

Ant-Man (4)

Yesterday, I found myself embroiled in a heated email conversation with some friends. See, I had apparently spoiled Ant-Man for some people. In a nutshell, after checking out our awesome Ant-Man competition, a non-comic book reading friend had some queries about Hank Pym/Scott Lang. I explained that Pym was the original comic-book Ant-Man who handed over the mantle to Lang for a while some years back, and in the movie Michael Douglas plays an older Pym who had been Ant-Man back in the day, and was now handing over the suit to Rudd’s Lang.

And then things blew up. Two friends claimed that I had just spoiled the movie for them. A fact that I strongly disagreed with, as the one sentence I had said revealed nothing about the movie’s plot. And besides, they’ve shown Pym giving Lang the Ant-Man suit in every single trailer that has been revealed, so no big deal, right?!

Well, here’s the problem. These friends have been avoiding everything they can about the movie and had thus not watched the trailers. They had adopted this ex-communication as a response to having been spoiled by other movie trailers in the past. And while I disagree with their definition of a “spoiler”, I can’t blame them as we’ve all been severely cheesed off before when movies gave away their entire plot in the trailers, right?


Wrong. It turns out that people like my friends are way more rare than you might think, because as was revealed in a recent EW article, people actually want to have movies spoiled for them by the trailers. Using the recent spoilery trailers for Southpaw, Jurassic World and Terminator: Genisys, EW spoke to those film’s directors to get their thoughts on major plot points being thrown out willy-nilly in previews months before their movie’s release. It seems that none of them were happy about it.

Antoine Fuqua, director of Southpaw, the trailer for which showed a major character being shot and killed:

“I was concerned about [the revelation], for sure. I still am. And I spoke my mind about it.”

Colin Trevorrow, director of Jurassic World, the promo campaign of which was plastered with the big money shot of Chris Pratt leading a pack of raptors on his motorcycle:

“In my opinion, [the studio has] shown far more of this movie than I would ever have wanted.”

Alan Taylor, director of Terminator Genisys, whose last trailer gave away the entire big third act plot twist about who the true villain was.

“I certainly directed those scenes with the intention that no one would know. One of my favorite moments  [REDACTED FOR YOUR PROTECTION] and everything from there until the turn, you’re supposed to think, Oh man, this is great.”

“I had a few heads ups and a few unpleasant conversations where I squawked about this or that.”


So if the directors didn’t want this info out there, then why was it included in trailers? Well, simply put: Audiences want it there. Matt Brubaker, President of Trailer Park, the firm that put together Southpaw‘s spoiler-filled trailer, explains:

“There was a lot of discussion internally whether to show [REDACTED]… But it was decided to show more of the good, so to speak. People have felt burned in the past. If someone’s going to pay $20 to go on opening weekend to see this movie, they want to know that they are making a pretty good investment.”

This is an argument that you may have heard – and shaken your head at – before, but it’s also one that’s backed up by facts. Studios conduct intense test screenings prior to a movie’s release to see what works and what doesn’t, and when it comes to trailers the results may be surprising.

“As much as people complain that trailers give away too much, nine times out of 10, the more of the plot you give away, the more interest you garner from the audiences. Audiences respond to the trailers with more of the movie.”

Dan Asma, co-owner of trailer company Buddha Jones, echoed that sentiment as they found the same happening with their test screenings, and just couldn’t ignore it.

“We prefer to be mysterious. That’s what good marketing is. But what can we do when testing and focus grouping consistently say that numbers spike when you give away more of the story?”

There does seem to be a definite demographic split though when it comes to who wants to see all the entire film given away in the trailers. Mark Woollen, the man behind the incredible (non-revealing) trailers for The Social Network and The Revenant, reveals that for an upcoming unnamed movie that he’s working on “Older audiences seemed to want more plot, and younger audiences were like, ‘Nah, it’s cool.’”


To be honest, I would have thought it was the other way around, as you would expect younger audience to have more of an “instant gratification” approach to movies, whereas older audiences coming from the pre-internet age of movie advertising where sometimes a poster was all you got, would have preferred to go in as clean as possible. Whichever way that chart is broken up though, the data shows that despite how much folks like us might grumble about it, the majority of audiences want spoilers in trailers. Studios are merely playing the demand and supply game here.

There are exceptions though. Christopher Nolan is famous for keeping a tight lid on his productions, and the mysterious but exciting trailers for Inception, Interstellar and The Dark Knight demonstrate this approach perfectly. The difference is that Nolan has enough Hollywood clout that he has it written into his contract that he has final say about the film’s marketing. Other directors simply don’t have that sway, as Southpaw director Antoine Fuqua stated that “The audience sometimes, I guess, needs a little bit more [plot], especially for this type of movie. So I had to roll with it. I trust them, [Southpaw’s distributor] the Weinstein Company.”

And when Southpaw opened this weekend past on a very limited release, it ended up making well above initial estimates. So I guess Fuqua’s trust in the studio was well founded, and despite how much it may irk me, we shouldn’t expect spoilery trailers to go away anytime soon.

Now for me to go spoil Ant-Man some more for my friends by revealing that this movie actually takes place in the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Critical Hit as an organisation.

Last Updated: July 28, 2015


  1. RinceThis

    July 28, 2015 at 14:40

    Ohhhh. This is a tough one .Firstly I agree with your friends, and also disagree. It isn’t a spoiler as such but if they wanted to know nothing then it is… Then again they should have done what many of us have been wanting to do for years and just taped/stitched your mouth shut. They should have shouted “NOooooooo!” to be honest, I do that when I want to go into a movie not knowing anything, which is why I was burned so bad when I chose not to know the concept for the indie movie ‘Nick spends the night with a tripping goat in Las Vegas’…


    • Alien Emperor Trevor

      July 28, 2015 at 18:58

      Spoiler alert – It was Nick that was tripping and the goat was unpleasantly surprised.


  2. juzzlehizzle

    July 28, 2015 at 15:47

    Boy. Imagine when they figure out that numbers will spike at the box office when you feed people just enough in a trailer to get them in the cinema.

    Seriously, you have to define first what constitutes a spoiler. People are so savvy today that unless you’ve crafted an absolutely brilliant film or have put together something mindblowingly orginal, they already know what they’re getting.

    And when it comes to Genysis, I think that big reveal was to sooth people and let them know what to expect about a major plot point instead of let them find out in the cinema, get pissed off and walk our bad-mouthing the film to others.

    I don’t really care about plot point reveals as any film that is really worth your time is worth more than a moment in the story. Somebody died? They didn’t actually die? Big deal. It’s how that impacts the rest of the story that matters. It’s others details of the film that matter and other characters.

    I don’t go so that I can spend an hour sitting in the cinema for one moment. I go for the whole damn thing and that’s what matters and that’s why Nolan’s films are often so worthwhile.


    • Kervyn Cloete

      July 28, 2015 at 16:54

      This is my argument as well. I try to avoid serious plot spoilers as much as I can, but seeing individual 3-second moments out of context is not the same thing.


      • juzzlehizzle

        July 28, 2015 at 17:41

        Yeah, it really doesn’t mean anything without knowing the stakes of the story
        or the value to the characters.

        And like i said above, if the experience of the film is spoiled by a reveal of a moment, then really, how good is that film. Shouldn’t it offer worthwhile quality throughout the running time?

        There’s performances and character and dialogue and well crafted scenes and cinematography and what have you. if the whole film is spoiled because of a reveal of plot or story, then what else did it have to offer besides what was revealed?

        I totally get that there’s some stuff that just shouldn’t be revealed (the Genysis twist being a case in point. Don’t Look Now or The Sixth Sense as well). You’d be an idiot to reveal that kind of thing because if the whole film is an experience, then those moments add something really strong to the experience.

        But if the rest of the is a piece of crap, I’m not sure how much spoliing one moment is going to affect your experience of the rest of it


  3. Alien Emperor Trevor

    July 28, 2015 at 19:01

    I remember reading an article a while back where they’d done some research on spoilers & found that they didn’t really ruin peoples’ appreciation of the movie, because the majority of the enjoyment came from watching the entire story unfold – irrespective if some plot points had been spoiled.

    Granted, that doesn’t excuse thrillers for spoiling the entire damn ending.


    • RinceThis

      July 29, 2015 at 08:55

      Spoiler. He was dead the whole time! tehehehe


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Sequels, uh, find a way as Jurassic Park Evolution 2 is coming this year

Jurassic Park's favourite professor of chaos theory kicked off a new reveal for the sequel…