Home Entertainment Paramount defends Darren Aronofsky’s mother! as “very audacious and brave”

Paramount defends Darren Aronofsky’s mother! as “very audacious and brave”

4 min read
5

The next month and a half is going to be hell. I was supposed to attend a press screening for mother! yesterday, however the distributors decided to postpone the screening to the end of next month, closer to the film’s South African release day. That means that until that time, I’m going to have to pull off some serious internet gymnastics to avoid spoilers whenever people are talking about it. And they sure as hell have a lot to say.

The latest film from celebrated auteur Darren Aronofsky (Black Swan, Requiem for a Dream, Noah), mother! had been shrouded in mystery – including the reason for its odd title punctuation – until it premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival two weeks back. All we knew was that it had an all-star cast of Jennifer Lawrence, Javier Bardem, Ed Harris and Michelle Pfeiffer, had some kind of horror element and potentially looked totally bonkers. Then people got to see it, and tongues were immediately wagging everywhere as it seems we all underestimated just crazy it would get.

The result was a movie that was seemingly the very definition of divisive. Some critics praised Aronofsky for making a film that is reportedly challenging, while others dismissed it as opulent self-indulgence. It would appear that audiences agreed with the latter as the film opened in the US this Friday past to a meagre $7.5 million opening. What’s worse, it earned itself a rather rare and dreaded F Cinemascore (an opening day audience survey conducted post-shows) which means word of mouth – and thus its legs at the box office – will not be good.

Despite all of this negative reception though, Paramount Pictures – who are releasing the film worldwide – are not throwing Aronofsky and his film under the bus. The studio’s worldwide president of marketing and distribution Megan Colligan has come out in defence of the film, declaring in an official statement to THR that “this movie is very audacious and brave.”

You are talking about a director at the top of his game, and an actress at the top her game. They made a movie that was intended to be bold. Everyone wants original filmmaking, and everyone celebrates Netflix when they tell a story no one else wants to tell. This is our version. We don’t want all movies to be safe. And it’s okay if some people don’t like it.

I completely and utterly agree with Colligan here. Aronofsky’s never been one to really make easy films. The Wrestler is arguably his most general audience-friendly work, but everything else has been challenging in some way. I like that about his filmography. Noah, his last movie before mother!, was just as divisive as he wrapped a big biblical epic around a controversial character study and then threw in some dark fantasy elements to boot. There was nothing else out there like it, which is precisely why I appreciated it.

Now from what I can tell – because I’m actively trying to avoid any revelatory information about this film – mother! is his most far-out batshit crazy concept yet (note: Nobody is actually accusing it of being badly made or acted in the slightest as the Aronofsky and co are far too good at what they do for that). And yes, “far-out batshit crazy” won’t be for everybody. But like Colligan says, we can’t keep decrying franchise and sequel fatigue and pleading for something that breaks the mundanity a bit, and then when it actually comes along we dismiss it as self-pleasuring bunk.

And for a studio like Paramount – which is one the biggest contributors of cinematic noise with the likes of the Transformers franchise –  to actually take a risk on a difficult film like this is a huge deal. To have their attempts to break the mould be thrown back in their faces is concerning, not just for them but for us as audience members as well. Next time they’re faced with the decision of whether to take another risk on an intriguingly original concept that may just be the next modern classic, or just churn out another CG-schlockfest that guarantees easy money, what do you think they’re going to choose?

PS: mother! was made for $35 million and had almost no advertising costs thanks to its secrecy. On top of the $7.5 million it made domestically, it added another $6 million from international markets. With so much talk going on right now about it, even if it’s people dismissing it, it might just spark more audiences to go see it for themselves. Everybody loves a good bit of rubbernecking after all. And if enough of it happens, mother! might just break even or possibly turn a profit.

Last Updated: September 20, 2017

5 Comments

  1. Different doesn’t mean good…but yeah, I totally agree with “we can’t keep decrying franchise and sequel fatigue and pleading for something that breaks the mundanity a bit, and then when it actually comes along we dismiss it as self-pleasuring bunk.”

    People are too quick to trash a movie that doesn’t fit their tastes, so I take all film critique (professional and plebeian) with a pinch of salt, because sometimes it is might be damn good movie even if “action” or “rom-com” is not in your taste. There are many examples of this. But what can we do?

    http://hw-img.datpiff.com/mb38339e/Klihe_Thats_Life-front.jpg

    Reply

  2. Ghost In The Rift

    September 20, 2017 at 13:13

    Unfortunately i watched a spoiler review and from what was said and what happens in the movie i will not be watching this because of one particular not very nice scene in the movie…just know ill barf . Not the type of movie for me to walk in spoiler free.

    Reply

    • Skittle

      September 20, 2017 at 14:05

      Was it gore?

      Reply

      • Ghost In The Rift

        September 21, 2017 at 08:19

        Without spoiling yes, the type that you usually get a warning about , i have no problem with gore , to an extent, but if you like walking out of a movie asking yourself WTF did i just see? this is it and you’ll love it.

        Reply

  3. Original Heretic

    September 20, 2017 at 13:15

    My first exposure to an Aronofsky film was Requiem for a Dream. I’ve subsequently compared all his movies to that one.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Check Also

A woman undertakes a violent search for her missing sister in the crime thriller Catch the Fair One

A Native American woman (Kali Reis) embarks on the fight of her life when she goes in sear…