Home Entertainment Regal Cinemas joins Universal/AMC feud, says it won’t screen any movie with VOD release

Regal Cinemas joins Universal/AMC feud, says it won’t screen any movie with VOD release

4 min read
23

A war is brewing and it’s one that’s even more ridiculous than the World War III memes from earlier this year. As we learned yesterday, the two sides in this engagement are Universal Pictures and AMC Theatres. The former kicked off this fracas when it gave Trolls: World Tour a simultaneous theatrical and VOD release in light of COVID-19 cinema lockdown restrictions. And much to everybody’s surprise, the animated sequel has earned around $100 million from digital sales. This unprecedented success led to Universal proclaiming it would explore day-and-date digital release for more films in the future.

This didn’t sit well with AMC Theatres, the world’s largest cinema chain, who believed that studios should not breach the traditional three-month theatrical exclusivity window. They believed it so strongly that they’ve now banned all Universal movies from their thousands of venues going forward. And now AMC just got some backup in this feud. First, NATO (that’s the National Association of Theatre Owners, not the other NATO) admonished Universal for having “a destructive tendency to both announce decisions affecting their exhibitor partners without actually consulting with those partners”. More importantly though, not long thereafter, Regal Cinemas, the second-largest cinema chain in the world, stepped into the fray as well.

In a statement issued via Deadline, Regal Cinemas owner Cineworld declared Universal’s plans to break from the traditional release window as “completely inappropriate.”

Universal unilaterally chose to break our understanding and did so at the height of the Covid-19 crisis when our business is closed, more than 35,000 employees are at home and when we do not yet have a clear date for the reopening of our cinemas. Universal’s move is completely inappropriate and certainly has nothing to do with good faith business practice, partnership and transparency.

Cineworld continued by saying that the traditional policy of timed theatrical release exclusivity “is clear, well known in the industry and is part of our commercial deal with our movie suppliers,” and as such, henceforth Regal Cinemas has decided to throw down the gauntlet to any studio that breaks from that policy.

Today we make it clear again that we will not be showing movies that fail to respect the windows as it does not make any economic sense for us. We have full confidence in the industry’s current business model. No one should forget that the theatrical side of this industry generated an all-time record income of $42 billion last year and the movie distributors’ share of this was about $20 billion.

Oof. Now it has to be pointed out that Regal Cinemas is being a bit more sensible here than AMC. The latter’s decision to ban ALL Universal Pictures productions going forward is just plain stupid. AMC is currently suffering massive and potentially crippling financial losses due to the COVID-19 lockdown and cannot afford to shut out the second most lucrative film studio in the world, effectively chasing paying customers to competitors. You think when Fast and Furious 9 releases next year, AMC will really choose their honour over refilling their rapidly emptying coffers with that Vin Diesel star power? It’s just a silly bit of self-damaging chest-thumping right now!

What Regal Cinemas is doing though, by effectively only banning those specific movies that get simultaneous digital and theatrical releases, is a lot more tenable. Especially since major Hollywood studios like Universal are probably not going to give their tentpole blockbuster franchises like Fast & Furious early VOD releases anyway. The entire point of a tentpole blockbuster is to earn so massively at the box office that its success can prop up smaller, not quite as profitable productions. Bolstering the numbers of the latter through VOD release makes a lot more sense though… but that only works when you also have theatrical sales in the mix.

At this point, no other major studio has really weighed into this messy engagement yet. If any of them would be able to backup Universal’s play here though, it would be Disney. Not only is the 1000 pound rodent in the room the largest studio in the world by a huge margin, owning the biggest film franchises of all time (and hence a studio the cinemas chains can’t afford to not do business with), but they already have their very own VOD release framework in place in the form of Disney+. We’ve already seen them yank the upcoming Artemis Fowl movie from cinemas to stick on their streaming service instead, and there’s nothing stopping them from doing that again with more small or mid-sized releases. If that happens, then this war will go fully nuclear and probably leave the world – at the least the movie business side of it – in a very different place.

Last Updated: July 29, 2020

23 Comments

  1. Yeah, well, these cinema chains are cutting off their nose to spite their face! They are technically biting the hand that feeds them. I can see studios surviving relatively easily without cinemas as there are many other mediums through which they can distribute their productions, but if the cinemas don’t get those blockbuster movies, their attendance numbers will undoubtedly drop!

    Reply

    • Pariah

      April 30, 2020 at 10:42

      It’s weird to me. Look at Regal’s numbers there. $20B went to cinemas, of the $42B earned. So like, if PVOD is viable and studios can earn more on average by cutting out the middle man (like instead of $22B they can get $25B+), then cinemas are going to be dropped like dead weight. Seems like they’re helping themselves out the door.

      Reply

    • Pariah

      April 30, 2020 at 10:42

      It’s weird to me. Look at Regal’s numbers there. $20B went to cinemas, of the $42B earned. So like, if PVOD is viable and studios can earn more on average by cutting out the middle man (like instead of $22B they can get $25B+), then cinemas are going to be dropped like dead weight. Seems like they’re helping themselves out the door.

      Reply

  2. MaSeKind

    April 30, 2020 at 12:05

    Lol just helping the death of cinema along with a move like that. People will be avoiding cinemas for a while anyway after things go back to normal, when or whatever that may be.

    Reply

  3. Stoompot

    April 30, 2020 at 10:21

    We’re banning Universal films because Universal made $100 million on a crappy Troll movie not using us. Wow, AMC really showed them. Cinemas are cesspools anyway.

    Reply

    • Son of Banana Jim

      April 30, 2020 at 16:17

      AMC is on the brink of bankruptcy. It’s only a matter of time before they shut their doors.

      Reply

      • Stoompot

        May 4, 2020 at 08:13

        Really? Probably due to lockdown? Most businesses are suffering badly.

        Reply

        • Kervyn Cloete

          May 4, 2020 at 09:39

          Yes, they are tanking badly. They’ve delayed releasing their first quarter financials so we don’t know exactly how screwed they are, but all indications suggest that there’s a possibility they won’t survive the lockdowns. Which is actually a big WTF moment, because how does the biggest cinema chain in the world not have any form of financial reserves in case of emergencies?!

          Reply

          • Stoompot

            May 4, 2020 at 09:46

            Probably thought to themselves, what are the odds of us bankrupting? People will always come see movies, lets pay all the bonuses!

          • HvR

            May 4, 2020 at 10:12

            Because having financial reserves in liquidity funds to cover you for months is bad business decision …. when you are not in lockdown.

            They were going to die in their current form in case, Corona just accelerated the process by a couple of years.

          • HvR

            May 4, 2020 at 10:12

            Because having financial reserves in liquidity funds to cover you for months is bad business decision …. when you are not in lockdown.

            They were going to die in their current form in case, Corona just accelerated the process by a couple of years.

  4. Original Heretic

    April 30, 2020 at 10:58

    This may work in our (the consumer’s) favour.
    The smaller movies that don’t need big screen viewings can now be enjoyed sooner.
    Save the blockbusters for the big screen!
    I honestly feel that I would have missed. Out if I hadn’t watched Endgame on the big screen.

    Reply

    • Pariah

      April 30, 2020 at 11:32

      I don’t feel like I missed out waiting on Endgame tbh. I can’t see any good reason to spend that much money at a cinema, not even for the “experience”. Like, a movie costs R80 plus popcorn and drink plus transport, easily like R150 for one movie, per person. That’s more than a month’s sub to a streaming service which I can watch as much as I want, whenever I want, with whomever I want. On my couch. Literally for the same content.

      Reply

      • Lu

        April 30, 2020 at 13:22

        Yep. IMAX 3d for a couple with a popcorn + drink combo each is almost R500 during peak times (Learned that with Retch of the Skywalker).
        20 Movies = the price of a 55″ UHD Samsung TV with a soundbar
        With Amazon and Apple TV I may as well buy/rent the movie and watch at my leisure without inconsiderate people ruining the experience.

        Reply

  5. The D

    April 30, 2020 at 11:03

    FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!

    Reply

    • Pariah

      April 30, 2020 at 11:32

      Don’t tell me what to do! You’re not my mom!

      Reply

  6. Banie Joubert

    April 30, 2020 at 11:03

    Reminds me of the big fight Netflix had with the Cannes Film Festival which ended with Netflix withdrawing completely. Times are changing and technology is changing with it. We used to go to the movies often, once or twice a month. Now with Netflix we only go if we really want to see the movie, like with Star Wars etc. Movie houses need to change with the times, or they will go out of business. Acting like bullies will bite them in the ass later on.

    Reply

    • CodeDisQus

      May 4, 2020 at 09:08

      Honestly, if they lower the price of popcorn, I’ll be more inclined to go. I’m not about to pay the price of 3 streetwise 2s for stale popcorn and watered down fanta f that sh!t

      Reply

      • Kervyn Cloete

        May 4, 2020 at 09:39

        This will sadly never happen. Cinemas make next to nothing off the price of movie tickets (iirc it’s only somewhere around 4%), with the lion’s share going to the studios and film distributors. That’s why cinema confectionery costs so damn much. The movie is just there to lure you in to buy their actual product: overpriced snacks. That’s the only way they actually make money.

        Reply

        • CodeDisQus

          May 4, 2020 at 10:22

          Yea that’s true, but I mean, at least make it good. As a consumer, paying R40 for Popcorn that is stale and cold is just meh….
          Anyways I don’t think that that is driving people away from the movies, the fact that, for the price of 2 movie tickets, one can watch 1 months worth of movies is hurting them.

          All that being said, the DAY that blockbuster movies tickets are available, I’m booking my IMAX ticket, so in reality I’m complaining for nothing hahaah

          Reply

  7. Son of Banana Jim

    April 30, 2020 at 16:01

    Basically looks like a bunch of dinosaurs flexing their muscles at the approaching asteroid. Press F for out of touch cinema companies. Instead of finding a way to capitalise on this, they’re screetching at the moon like a bunch of sjws.

    Reply

    • Son of Banana Jim

      April 30, 2020 at 16:01

      One simple way would be to negotiate a deal where you can stream content in your cinemas. Not everyone has netflix, and you can even make an event of it. But, who am I kidding, this is like blockbuster flexing at Netflix’s new streaming service and getting steamrolled because hubris always leads to a fall.

      Reply

  8. Jawaka99

    May 1, 2020 at 02:42

    Gee, how will I survive not paying $12 for a bucket of popcorn and $8 for a coke?

    Actually pretty easily.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Chris McKay confirms that Lego Batman 2 isn’t happening

Chris McKay has confirmed that with Lego now moving to Universal, all plans for his Lego B…