FFD: Who’s ruining gaming most?

1 min read


For better or worse (mostly worse, it seems) videogames and the video game industry is changing. In this internet-connected world, games no longer have to be – nor could they ever be – completely bug-free. Hell, they don’t even have to be whole – as some will gladly sell you the game’s ending as DLC. Others will try sell you other things – like costumes, hair-styles and goddamned cheat codes as DLC instead.

And then, there are those who, in this internet-connected world, insist on having their games utilise the internet – whether or not we want them to. We’ve got single player games that require persistent internet connections, we’ve got single player games that have all sorts of stupid social dick-measuring contests built right in to them. If some had their way, we  wouldn’t have single player games at all.

So who’s ruining gaming most? Is it Activision and Ubisoft with its annual rehashes; EA with its focus on social experiences and knifing single player games in the back; Bethesda, who’re unable to get things working properly? Maybe its Capcom, who’ll nickel-and-dime you for all you’re worth – or Square-Enix who’ll charge you extra for a “true ending?.” Maybe you’re one of the few who hates on Valve, believing that its Steam service is destroying video games.

Let us know who you think’s making gaming suck.

Last Updated: September 7, 2012

Geoffrey Tim

Editor. I'm old, grumpy and more than just a little cynical. One day, I found myself in possession of a NES, and a copy of Super Mario Bros 3. It was that game that made me realise that games were more than just toys to idly while away time - they were capable of being masterpieces. I'm here now, looking for more of those masterpieces.

Check Also

Ubisoft announces Mario+Rabbids Community Competition that could see winners off to Gamescom

It has been one year since Mario had to start dealing with an invasion of Rabbids on the N…