Home Gaming Ubisoft revamps editorial board to combat the stagnation of its games

Ubisoft revamps editorial board to combat the stagnation of its games

2 min read
19

A report from Video Game Chronicle indicates that the body which governed what exactly went into a Ubisoft game is being split up so as to provide a broader range of games.

48039335616_3e0af08b96_o

What used to be looked upon as a formula that was utterly enthralling and groundbreaking has slowly stagnated over the years, and I’m not talking about Steer’s chips. “Ubisoft Game” has become less of a title and more of a genre unto itself, with so many of their games following an almost identical gameplay loop. Massive open world, an abundance of collectable items dished out randomly, massive skill trees and apolitical stories that actually have an abundance of politics at their core, no matter what anyone says.

Hell, when Assassin’s Creed: Origins attempted to switch the formula with loot and RPG elements every game that followed it took exactly the same path. Many of Ubisoft’s single-player offerings have become somewhat tired, possibly why so many of their upcoming titles were delayed by months following the poor reception of Ghost Recon: Breakpoint. In an effort to curb this rapidly spreading staleness, Ubisoft is totally re-organising the company’s editorial board.

NTjGRa2rmoA7fsfvPg6VDX

See, it used to be that a board of very qualified and special game designers and producers sat around a table in France and decided what would be sprinkled into every game, but clearly Ubisoft isn’t happy that all the drinks and chips they provide for these meetings isn’t resulting in the blockbuster games they’re used to. To modernise the whole system, Ubisoft has split the board up, giving seven vice presidents control over specific franchises like some video game equivalent of The Templars, as ironic as that is. All of these vice presidents will still need to check in with CEO Yves Guillemot but will be able to run their franchise however they want.

ubisoft-conf-e3-watch-dogs-legion-1448x815

An anonymous source told Video Game Chronicle, “In the previous system that editorial we had, there were often the ideas of just one or two people getting put into every game. That’s why you tended to see such similarity, because it’s the same taste and opinion being replicated.” This will hopefully bring some red back into the slowly paling cheeks of Ubisoft’s originality and maybe, hopefully, spell the eventual return of Splinter Cell. That’s just a wing and pray from me though; I just want Sam Fisher sneaking back into my life, the deadly rascal.

Last Updated: January 20, 2020

19 Comments

  1. Hammersteyn

    January 20, 2020 at 13:49

    Ghost Recon: Breakpoint is kak because they it’s always online, they removed the AI buddies and they tried to overmonitize it! I’m busy playing Origins while Breakpoint is just laying there, installed and almost unplayed and I am in no hurry to get back to it.

    Reply

  2. HairyEwok

    January 20, 2020 at 14:21

    Is this going to affect current in development games? I mean beyond good and evil 2 is still a thing.

    Reply

    • BradeLunner

      January 20, 2020 at 15:07

      Oh my I clean forgot about this one! That trailer was incredible

      Reply

  3. Gr8_Balls_o_Fire

    January 20, 2020 at 19:57

    “In the previous system that editorial we had, there were often the
    ideas of just one or two people getting put into every game. That’s why
    you tended to see such similarity, because it’s the same taste and
    opinion being replicated.”

    NOBODY across Ubisoft noticed all the similarities?

    Reply

  4. Mark Treloar

    January 21, 2020 at 07:16

    Someone must have finally stopped smoking crack

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Check Also

Have a Far Cry 5 Weekend on Ubisoft

I’m baaaaack…. Geez…bugs are sneaky but stupid. I still feel like warmed up Gouda, but any…