1.jpg

That’s not to say that Lords of Shadow is ruthless, it just asks you to give it your attention and once you start understanding the mechanics, you will find the combat system to be very rewarding and everything will start falling into place as you dismember and terrorize anything that gets in your way with precision.

Even though Castlevania does still use the typical combat and upgrade systems found in most other games in the genre, it has included some neat ideas as well. Light or Dark magic can be activated during combat and modifies your existing attacks as well as opens up new possibilities. While on a basic level Light magic attacks heal you and Dark magic attacks do more damage, they will also modify secondary or special weapons and can also open up special combos that only work while activated.

You fill your magic meters by killing enemies (or finding an orbs dispenser) and absorbing orbs by holding either your left or right thumb stick (for the light or dark meter). Another element in this new scheme is a focus meter that fills up the longer you are able to attack enemies without getting hit. When the focus meter is full, enemies will start dumping tons of orbs during combat but be warned, just one hit and the meter resets back to nothing.

This new system is very interesting indeed, especially with regards to the healing properties of the Light magic as you will often be sent through long areas where you as a player have to rely on your own abilities to be able to constantly generate enough orbs for your meters to keep refilling your health.

Castlevania is also what some might call a seriously damn fine looking game. The framerate can be a little inconsistent at times (high and low) and some of the characters might not look so hot up close, but that’s about it.

2.jpg

This is an amazingly gorgeous looking game that not only benefits from good tech, but also some of the most phenomenal art direction and settings that you will have seen in this generation ranging from giant titans and massive castles to lush forests, frozen lakes and old ruins. It keeps up with the best of the bunch most of the time, and often had me pausing to appreciate the view. A very nice extra touch was included in the form of moves/combo descriptions being animated with pencil sketches in the book interface.

Lords of Shadow also benefits from a high-quality orchestral soundtrack that is memorable, atmospheric and as good as anything that you would expect to hear in a big budget Hollywood film. To add to even that, they recruited some top notch voice actors as well such as Robert Carlyle as Gabriel and Patrick Stewart as another character who also serves as the narrator of the game.

Conclusion:

If you are looking for a long, engaging and challenging action/platformer title to keep you busy for a good while, then Castlevania will serve you well. It’s got some problems and can cause some heavy frustration at times but once you get into it, you won’t want to put it down.

4.jpg


Scoring:

Gameplay: 8.8

Combat requires your full attention and can be very rewarding. Platforming is fairly solid but can be frustrating at times, especially when the camera is at fault.

Presentation: 9.0

I love great looking graphics, who doesn’t. I love great art direction even more, and this has both. Presentation is, on the whole, pretty wonderful even though there are a few issues to be found here and there with the tech.

Sound: 9.0

Wonderful soundtrack and great voice talent go well with an overall good sounding game.

Value: 8.5

The 18-20 hour story mode has plenty to offer and there is decent incentive to give it a second or even third play-through.

Overall: 9.0 (not an average)

I admit that it took a little while at first, but over time, Castlevania: Lords of Shadow won me over with its lengthy campaign, great visuals and rewarding gameplay.

[Reviewed on Playstation 3]

Last Updated: October 20, 2010

Pages 1 2
Castlevania: Lords of Shadow
9.0

19 Comments

  1. Have to see this in action , I like pretty graphics.

    Reply

  2. Dark

    October 20, 2010 at 10:39

    Hey he looks like hes from Persia 🙂

    Reply

  3. Hayate

    October 20, 2010 at 11:28

    Nice review.Do wish the lazygamer reviews could be out sooner.Especially on great titles such as this

    Reply

  4. Geoffrey Tim

    October 20, 2010 at 11:31

    Sometimes, we get the games on, or slightly before release date – as was the case with C:LOS. If we get a game well before release, we do try to have our reviews out by release date, latest.

    Reply

  5. AC!D

    October 20, 2010 at 12:49

    Hey Lazygamer reviewers just a off topic question:

    Fallout NV: Is anyone at Lazygamer currently reviewing the game? I just want to confirm some of the massive tech problems this game is having.

    The Fallout Forums are a shambles:

    – The biggest problems seem to be with the 360 version. Quite a few ppl cant enter the New Vegas strip. So basically they cant continue the story. The second biggest problem seems to be something to do with all your saves being corrupted. No one knows how it happens and even guys with 10 saves suddenly have them all corrupted at a certain point in the game. Then theres the freezing. Expect the game to freeze on you about 20 times at least during the game thats if you havent run into the two bigger bugs posted above. Also some massive performance issues are reported.

    – The PS3 version might have all those problems i posted above but no one has reported anything yet like those in the forums. The biggest problem posted so far is about the Freezing on PS3. Some say its as regular as every hour while other say it doesnt happen so much. Also there seems to be a problem with the DLC codes. They werent working on the store. I think they fixed it though and now apparently if you use these downloadable pre order extras a big exclamation mark appears on screen in both the 360 and PS3 version when you equip these DLC weapons. Also massive performance issues are reported.

    – Im not even going to go into the host of problems of the PC version but the biggest complaints so far is that Nvidia cards are having massive problems. Also the same story with crashes and lagging. Some also rerport that their stats arent working in Hardcore mode

    I was planning on picking up the 360 version because the Fallour 3 GOTY PS3 edition was absolute rubbish. So can anyone confirm these problems if you guys have received your review copies yet???? I would like to cancel my pre order for the game before friday if true! It seems like NV is really broken when you read some of the reviews and see the rage in the Fallout NV forums just one day into release.

    Thanks in advance!!!

    Reply

  6. Geoffrey Tim

    October 20, 2010 at 12:53

    Not yet; We should be receiving our review copies tomorrow only.

    Reply

  7. AC!D

    October 20, 2010 at 12:56

    Which version will you guys be reviewing 360/PC/PS3?

    Reply

  8. Geoffrey Tim

    October 20, 2010 at 13:02

    It really depends on what we get sent. Will in all likelihood be the Xbox 360 version.

    Reply

  9. AC!D

    October 20, 2010 at 13:12

    Good stuff thanks. Also whoever reviews the game please post an impressions article when you get to about 10 to 20 hour game mark. That seems to be where all the major problems occur. Dont wait till you finish the entire game which could take a couple of weeks. Im sure other gamers other Lazygamer fanboys other than myself would greatly aprreciate it :biggrin:

    In the meantime i think im going to cancel my pre order till some big patches and more reliable impressions come out.

    Reply

  10. Nick de Bruyne

    October 20, 2010 at 13:36

    @Hayata

    I did receive this game nice and early for review (not the usual case like Geoff has mentioned below) however I made the personal decision to not rush the review, and I believe in this case that it was well worth that choice.

    Had I just tried to pump something out by release day, I don’t think it would have done the game justice at all. I hope you will appreciate our wanting to deliver detailed quality reviews.

    Reply

  11. Nick de Bruyne

    October 20, 2010 at 13:42

    @AC!D

    When I reviewed Fallout 3, I managed to play just under 30 hours and get a whole review written up in the span of around 36 hours. I nearly died that weekend lol.

    Reply

  12. AC!D

    October 20, 2010 at 14:10

    😆 Well dont go that crazy this time since its pretty obvious that if you liked Fallout 3 you will like this. I think most ppl have made up their mind about the game. The problem is when you read a review like the Joystiq one that says the game still feels like its in beta plus all those complaints in the official forums you get worried about the technical problems. To put that in perspective Bataman Arkham City went into Beta a month ago is is still only 12 months away. So very strong words indeed coming from Joysti.com

    I know im getting the 360 version because histroy tells me Bethesda only really care about the PC and 360 guys but i just want to know if i should get this at all because there are horrible problems with this game if the forums are to be believed.

    What worries me even more is that if these problems are so big and so real then why the hell did Sony and MS not reject this in the submission process?

    Me thinks im going to have a massive rant on the Official PS3 + Xbox360 + Fallout blogs and sites if they ruined my Fallout NV experience just to get this out in time for the holidays and Sony and MS didnt want to upset the Bethesda applecart by rejecting submission.

    Reply

  13. Nick de Bruyne

    October 20, 2010 at 14:28

    A title update would do the trick for sure but in how long? If they were happy to release it this way they were either already working on an update, or hoping that no one noticed.

    I really don’t want it spoiled by bugs either. You must remember that each reviewer has their own experience, some may have experienced little to none while the Joystiq guy may have gotten the worst of the lot all at once for all we know.

    Reply

  14. Cleric

    October 20, 2010 at 15:16

    BUT you STILL haven’t told me if I should get this or Enslaved?!?!?

    Tell me Nick, TELL ME!

    😛

    Reply

  15. Nick de Bruyne

    October 20, 2010 at 15:27

    OK well, at first I was more in favour of Enslaved, but now I think I am leaning towards Castlevania, however there are a few factors involved that will come down to personal preference.

    You mean besides the one having a higher review score than the other?

    If you only have cash for one game and it needs to keep you busy, then Castlevania is a lot of entertainment for the money. Enslaved is short but very story centric with great characters.

    Enslaved is short, weaker on gameplay and stronger on story. Castlevania is long, stronger on gameplay, weaker on story.

    That’s all you need to know to make your decision.

    Reply

  16. AC!D

    October 20, 2010 at 15:39

    Pretty much what Nick said. I love both but id also rate Castlevania slightly better than Enslaved.

    Reply

  17. Cleric

    October 20, 2010 at 15:53

    Haha, wasn’t expecting a real response tbh, but thanks anyway 😉

    Given my current backlog, I’ll only pick both up next year.

    Reply

  18. V@mp

    October 20, 2010 at 18:14

    Yeah, really enjoying this at the moment.

    Reply

  19. Kerrrang!

    October 20, 2010 at 19:56

    Definitely Castlevania. The review is pretty spot on, except that the lack of a mini-map didn’t bother me one bit, and i was never lost.

    Enslaved has excellent mocap, decent story, but that’s it. It controls like shit, horrible combat system, and stinted platforming. Castlevania is way, waaaay superior.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Microsoft Replacing 1 vs 100 With Full House Poker

Remember how 1 vs 100 was going to revolutionise the way people spend their evening as wel…