Considering the mixed critical and commercial reception – and endless pro/con fanboy soapboxing – garnered by 2013’s Man of Steel, a sequel was never really a sure thing. But Zack Snyder, returning director and main architect of this new DC Comics Cinematic Universe, got crafty. By not just including Batman in the follow-up film, but actually having the Dark Knight throw down against Superman in a titanic slobber knocker that draws its inspiration from Frank Miller’s seminal graphic novel “The Dark Knight Returns”, Snyder and the folks at Warner Bros ensured that rabidly excited fans would turn out in hordes for this comic book clash years in the making.


But then Batman v Superman suddenly morphed from just a Man of Steel sequel to the de facto launchpad of an entire movie universe, and people – myself included – started worrying. Just looking at the newly christened title alone, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was over-stuffed, ungainly and embarrassingly clumsy; could the actual movie, with its butt-numbing 150 minute running time and gallery of rumoured cameos, be following suit as just as over-stuffed, ungainly and clumsy?

The short answer: Not quite. The slightly longer and more descriptive answer: Batman v Superman delivers like a superpowered Kryptonian punch to the face, with all the subtlety that entails, although Ben Affleck’s Bruce Wayne/Batman and Henry Cavill’s Clark Kent/Superman both get a bit more narrative depth to work with than previous iterations. This is mainly due to the script by screenwriter Chris Terrio (fresh off an Oscar win with Affleck for Argo), which cleverly takes all the Man of Steel criticisms about collateral damage and transforms it into the core dramatic force underpinning this conflict in a believable fashion. That and also dropping a third act bombshell into the mix that left me slack-jawed not just for how brilliantly it ties together these two iconic characters, but also in how damn obvious it was, and yet which, in my nearly three decades of comic book reading, I had never seen anybody do before.


The self-referential adjustments don’t stop there though, as there are several one-liners tossed out by characters directly addressing several of the negatives thrown Man of Steel‘s way – the minimization of destruction, Superman behaving more heroic, etc. They’re just sly enough to not be fully-on-the-nose, but there’s no denying Snyder and co are indeed speaking directly to the audience in this case. They’re also speaking directly to that lizard part of the brain that gets all excited when things collide in spectacular pyrotechnic fashion as Snyder orchestrates some of the most utterly gobsmacking superhero action beats I’ve ever seen, ranging from epic widescreen godly slugfests to brutal close-quarters fights courtesy of the Dark Knight’s vicious limbs.


And as the Caped Crusader, Affleck comfortably silences the naysayers with a performance that is both physical and psychological, giving us a believably troubled Bruce Wayne and one of the best Batmen ever both in terms of straight-off-the-comic-book-page looks and and bone-breaking badassery. And finally doing proper detective work! Much like his much derided disguise, Cavill’s Clark Kent is almost non-existent, while his Superman is still not exactly the most exciting or inspiring – compounded by Snyder’s unerringly and insipidly morose messiah approach to the character – but he does get a few key moments and sells them well enough, even if he does almost end up a bit player in his own sequel.

As primary villain Lex Luthor, Jesse Eisenberg turns in a performance that is luckily not just a copy of his role in The Social Network but something entirely new. Actually, this Lex Luthor is unlike any version of the classic character we’ve ever seen, sitting somewhere between the almost corny mad scientist Lex and the deviously manipulative businessman Lex, with a dash of millennial neuroses thrown into the mix for good measure. There’s a brokenness to him that is both tragic and maddening, and which may irk some traditionalists (which is sort of silly as there have been so many different versions of this character already), but which also dovetails snugly with the overwhelming daddy issues that permeate so much of our two titular heroes’ tales.


Moving on from the gentlemen, the two leading ladies in the cast also hold their own. Amy Adams as reporter and Superman love interest Lois Lane proves her Oscar nominated acting credentials with just about every frame she finds herself in, even though she doesn’t exactly have to do the heaviest lifting around. But it’s Gal Gadot, making her debut as the final member of DC Comics’ vaunted heroic Trinity as Wonder Woman, which deserves the biggest ovation. It’s a cinematic bow that has been unforgivably long in the making, and while fairly thrifty it definitely doesn’t disappoint. As both her civilian alter ego Diana Prince, and as the demigod warrior Wonder Woman, there’s an unmistakable raw vitality and exoticism to her that just lights up every scene.


Hers is also a much needed enervation in a movie that is almost comprehensively grim, with not much in the way of levity throughout its running time – though here, with the prominence of the traditionally dark Batman, it feels far more tonally appropriate than it did in Man of Steel (and all bolstered by a fantastically dramatic score by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL).

But if you had a huge problem with some of the morality in Man of Steel, then a few of Snyder and Terrio’s character choices are going to possibly rub you up the wrong way, as it kind of did me. Even though there’s a definite logic to it in the context of this universe (which slightly softens the blow for me), hardcore comic book purists are undoubtedly going to have a conniption as Snyder once again butchers defining traits of characters – and one in particular – all in the pursuit of post-modern grittiness.


And while the film’s final two acts delivers some seriously bombastic action, and Snyder treats us to two very different, but both equally impressive opening sequences, the script’s first hour then develops a helter-skelter pitter-patter feel to it, as we rapidly jump from forced plot point to plot point to get this narrative ball rolling. It does admittedly strike a good balance of info dump hand-holding and respecting the audience to just figure it out, but there’s a definite lack of logical narrative structure as things just happen followed by other people doing other things with no coherent logic other than to setup the next Thing That Needs To Happen. I can also see that complete comic book newbies are going to be scratching their heads at some of the “big reveals” just foisted on them. And yes, those include the rumoured cameos and Justice League setups, which are luckily brief enough to not feel shoehorned into the plot but rather feel like glimpses into this wider universe, but is still about as setup-y as you can get. If you even know who and what you’re actually looking at, that is.


You may have noticed that we’re more than 1000 words into this review now already (sorry), and I’ve yet to actually mention the film’s plot. This is intentional, as the woefully mismanaged trailer campaign already spoiled so much of it, and I just don’t want to add to that bungling. I will be unpacking some of the film’s finer narrative points in detail on Monday, but for now I will just say that what Snyder has given us here is a film that improves on its predecessor in nearly every way – even retroactively making it better – but then repeats its previous fumbles in critical character aspects, while adding new problems with extremely muddled character motivations. And its examination of differing ideologies underpinning this conflict as well as its ruminations on theology and mythology, while initially a highly engaging argument as to why these heroes would come to blows, eventually also just devolve into a series of violent misunderstandings.


That being said, on the whole, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice still offers enough gawking comic book spectacle to stand as a viscerally enjoyable if monumentally grim while not feeling as butt-numbingly long or over-populated as many had feared, even though it does indeed double down on setting up what’s to come in the future DC Comics Cinematic Universe. But while it’s biggest missteps are mostly of the sort that will just rankle the comic book elite instead of the general movie-going public, they are unavoidable, leaving the finicky lifelong fanboy in me to give this movie a half star less than I initially would have liked. Not that the rest of me has noticed as it is just still grinning too hard at having seen the world’s two biggest superheroes – and Wonder Woman! – finally sharing the screen in such epic fashion. And then punching each other in the face real hard.

Last Updated: March 23, 2016



  1. RinceThis

    March 23, 2016 at 10:24

    4/5 for me because I am not a 100% full retard fanboy 😛 Loved the movie. Agreed, some points were very ‘this is the reason, because’ I am hoping in the extended version they will add a few more scenes to explain…


  2. James Francis

    March 23, 2016 at 14:51

    Wait, why does Batman have a cape on his mech suit?


    • Reidroc

      March 23, 2016 at 16:16

      Because cape. There is no other reason needed.


    • konfab

      March 23, 2016 at 16:24

      He would be Ratman without it.


  3. James Francis

    March 25, 2016 at 12:32

    When did Man of Steel become such an orphan?

    Maybe my memory is failing me, but a lot of people loved that movie. I had more than one online argument about it, as I didn’t like it that much, and it had numerous vocal defenders. Even Kervyn’s review gave it four stars, which is higher than he gave BvS.

    Now suddenly a lot of online buzz frame it as a a disappointment.

    I’m not trying to pick at wounds here, but am I getting this wrong or did popular opinion of Man of Steel slide backwards in the last three years?


    • Kervyn Cloete

      March 28, 2016 at 00:34

      I think I’ve mentioned it a couple of times on here before, but Man of Steel is a movie where over time, I’ve come to like it less. The problems become more glaring with each viewing. I still don’t outright dislike it as some did (especially those who voice the Killing Zod argument as their biggest gripe), but it’s definitely lost some shine for me.


  4. EyeGod

    April 1, 2016 at 13:25

    Good review, Kervs. As a hater of Snyder and a lover of Affleck the director mor than Affleck the actor, I must say I was pleasantly surprised: I LOVED THIS MOVIE. But, I’m unfamiliar with the DC universe lore – particularly the Superman side – so I didn’t have the highest expectations, especially not after MoS was proclaimed a PoS by most (now I wanna see it!). I will also admit that I only really went to watch this movie to see that scene from the trailer where Bats unleashes Arkham Trilogy style punishment on thugs and henchmen, and GOD WAS IT GOOD!!! That scene alone made the movie worth it for me, but I feel everything else worked surprisingly well, and I had little problem with the plot: for me it felt like it was all some mad kind of experiment that Luthor controlled all the time; even when things didn’t quite go his way, he managed to subvert the heroes cos he was one step ahead. Now I want that solo movie penned and directed by – and starring – Batfleck, whom I currently consider on par with (or possibly superior to) my favourite Bruce/Batman: Christian Bale. Gimme and escalation of that warehouse fight scene AND I’M SO IN!!!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Check Also

Fix Your Peepers on “The Witcher” Season 2 Trailer

To be honest I can’t remember much of the first season of The Witcher. I binge watch…